Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps-dev): bump ts-loader from 8.0.12 to 8.0.18 in /src/packages/excalidraw #178

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 14, 2021

Bumps ts-loader from 8.0.12 to 8.0.18.

Release notes

Sourced from ts-loader's releases.

v8.0.18

v8.0.17

v8.0.16

v8.0.15

v8.0.14

v8.0.13

Changelog

Sourced from ts-loader's changelog.

v8.0.18

v8.0.17

v8.0.16

v8.0.15

v8.0.14

v8.0.13

Commits
  • c2c1aef Optimize fileExists callback path (#1266)
  • 953358e Stop testing TypeScript 3.6 and 3.7
  • 591bd10 update docs for latest webpack 5 syntax (#1244)
  • e9c2677 Include standard webpack start/end locations in emitted errors (#1255)
  • 91206c4 Re-fix Webpack 5 watch not failing on error (#1254)
  • b8a70f9 Update definition files in watch mode in webpack@5 (#1249)
  • 6816735 Add afterDeclarations to getCustomTransformers in README.md (#1248)
  • 268bc69 chore(deps): upgrade most production deps (#1237)
  • e160564 Add a cache to file path mapping (#1228)
  • 14fa3f8 Add documentation about performance profiling (#1230)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Mar 14, 2021
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 14, 2021

Dependabot tried to add @ad1992 as a reviewer to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/steveruizok/excalidraw/pulls/178/requested_reviewers: 422 - Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the steveruizok/excalidraw repository. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 4, 2021

Superseded by #223.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Apr 4, 2021
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/src/packages/excalidraw/ts-loader-8.0.18 branch April 4, 2021 01:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants