Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Builds failing on RTD #304

Closed
arporter opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Builds failing on RTD #304

arporter opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@arporter
Labels
in progress

Comments

@arporter
Copy link
Member

arporter commented Nov 4, 2021

Currently the documentation is failing to build on ReadTheDocs. It was previously set to use Python 2.x so I've changed that to 3.x (within the RTD project). However, even though I've wiped the 'latest' and 'stable' build environments, the builds are still using Sphinx 1.8.5 and are failing as a result. (In PSyclone we're using 4.x of Sphinx.) I think maybe adding a pip_requirements.txt file in the doc directory will fix this.
arporter added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2021
@arporter
#304 add pip_requirements file and doc target in setup.py
aae5715
@arporter
Copy link
Member Author

arporter commented Nov 4, 2021

I've activated the RTD build for this branch and it built fine and used Sphinx 4.2.0.

@arporter arporter self-assigned this Nov 4, 2021
rupertford added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2021
@rupertford
pr #304. Updated changelog ready for merge to master.
0b9d77c
rupertford added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2021
@rupertford
Merge pull request #305 from stfc/304_rtd_build_fix
6558244 
#304 add pip_requirements file and doc target in setup.py
@rupertford
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this issue as #305 is on master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@arporter arporter

Labels
in progress
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rupertford @arporter