CLI: Fix using wrong package managers in existing projects #25474
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #
What I did
Changed the order of how we determine which package manager to use.
#23611#24997 Introduced automatic inference based on which command was being run (eg.npx
oryarn dlx
). However that took priority over the lock file, meaning runningnpx storybook@next upgrade
in a Yarn project would use npm and thus create an npm lockfile when it shouldn't. I don't think we should expect Yarn users to useyarn dlx
overnpx
everywhere.I believe the lock file should still be prioritized, and we should only infer it from the command if no lock file can be found - ie. when initing in an empty project.
This also fixed a minor bug where any
npm WARN
log messages duringnpm-check-updates
instorybook upgrade
would cause an error. We now correctly only throw an error if we seenpm ERR
in the logs.Checklist for Contributors
Testing
The changes in this PR are covered in the following automated tests:
Manual testing
This section is mandatory for all contributions. If you believe no manual test is necessary, please state so explicitly. Thanks!
Documentation
MIGRATION.MD
Checklist for Maintainers
When this PR is ready for testing, make sure to add
ci:normal
,ci:merged
orci:daily
GH label to it to run a specific set of sandboxes. The particular set of sandboxes can be found incode/lib/cli/src/sandbox-templates.ts
Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below:
Available labels
bug
: Internal changes that fixes incorrect behavior.maintenance
: User-facing maintenance tasks.dependencies
: Upgrading (sometimes downgrading) dependencies.build
: Internal-facing build tooling & test updates. Will not show up in release changelog.cleanup
: Minor cleanup style change. Will not show up in release changelog.documentation
: Documentation only changes. Will not show up in release changelog.feature request
: Introducing a new feature.BREAKING CHANGE
: Changes that break compatibility in some way with current major version.other
: Changes that don't fit in the above categories.🦋 Canary release
This pull request has been released as version
0.0.0-pr-25474-sha-c0c8ae28
. Install it by pinning all your Storybook dependencies to that version.More information
0.0.0-pr-25474-sha-c0c8ae28
jeppe/fix-package-manager-issues
c0c8ae28
1704457667
)To request a new release of this pull request, mention the
@storybookjs/core
team.core team members can create a new canary release here or locally with
gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook canary-release-pr.yml --field pr=25474