Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLI: Fix using wrong package managers in existing projects #25474

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

JReinhold
Copy link
Contributor

@JReinhold JReinhold commented Jan 5, 2024

Closes #

What I did

Changed the order of how we determine which package manager to use. #23611 #24997 Introduced automatic inference based on which command was being run (eg. npx or yarn dlx). However that took priority over the lock file, meaning running npx storybook@next upgrade in a Yarn project would use npm and thus create an npm lockfile when it shouldn't. I don't think we should expect Yarn users to use yarn dlx over npx everywhere.

I believe the lock file should still be prioritized, and we should only infer it from the command if no lock file can be found - ie. when initing in an empty project.

This also fixed a minor bug where any npm WARN log messages during npm-check-updates in storybook upgrade would cause an error. We now correctly only throw an error if we see npm ERR in the logs.

Checklist for Contributors

Testing

The changes in this PR are covered in the following automated tests:

  • stories
  • unit tests
  • integration tests
  • end-to-end tests

Manual testing

This section is mandatory for all contributions. If you believe no manual test is necessary, please state so explicitly. Thanks!

Documentation

  • Add or update documentation reflecting your changes
  • If you are deprecating/removing a feature, make sure to update
    MIGRATION.MD

Checklist for Maintainers

  • When this PR is ready for testing, make sure to add ci:normal, ci:merged or ci:daily GH label to it to run a specific set of sandboxes. The particular set of sandboxes can be found in code/lib/cli/src/sandbox-templates.ts

  • Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below:

    Available labels
    • bug: Internal changes that fixes incorrect behavior.
    • maintenance: User-facing maintenance tasks.
    • dependencies: Upgrading (sometimes downgrading) dependencies.
    • build: Internal-facing build tooling & test updates. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • cleanup: Minor cleanup style change. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • documentation: Documentation only changes. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • feature request: Introducing a new feature.
    • BREAKING CHANGE: Changes that break compatibility in some way with current major version.
    • other: Changes that don't fit in the above categories.

🦋 Canary release

This pull request has been released as version 0.0.0-pr-25474-sha-c0c8ae28. Install it by pinning all your Storybook dependencies to that version.

More information
Published version 0.0.0-pr-25474-sha-c0c8ae28
Triggered by @JReinhold
Repository storybookjs/storybook
Branch jeppe/fix-package-manager-issues
Commit c0c8ae28
Datetime Fri Jan 5 12:27:47 UTC 2024 (1704457667)
Workflow run 7421815964

To request a new release of this pull request, mention the @storybookjs/core team.

core team members can create a new canary release here or locally with gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook canary-release-pr.yml --field pr=25474

Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunEvening ShaunEvening left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense! Thank you for changing this, Jeppe <3

@JReinhold JReinhold marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 20:45
@valentinpalkovic
Copy link
Contributor

@JReinhold The description is misleading since #23611 never get merged.

@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen merged commit f854254 into next Jan 9, 2024
57 of 58 checks passed
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen deleted the jeppe/fix-package-manager-issues branch January 9, 2024 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants