Refactor ping pong encrypted example #1007

plebhash · 2024-06-26T20:33:01Z

similarly to #977, this PR is refactoring the examples/ping-pong-with-noise example into examples/ping-pong-encrypted.

I wrote it from scratch as an exercise to get familiar with protocols crates.

The overall idea is quite similar to the previous implementation, but with some simplifications to make the example easier to understand.

ping-pong-encrypted is an example of how to do encrypted SV2 traffic while leveraging the following crates:

binary_sv2
codec_sv2
framing_sv2 (which is actually just re-exported by codec_sv2)
noise_sv2

We establish a simple Ping-Pong protocol with a server and a client communicating over a TCP socket.

The server expects to receive a Ping message encoded as a SV2 binary frame.
The Ping message contains a nonce, which is a u8 generated randomly by the client.

The client expects to get a Pong message in response, also encoded as a SV2 binary frame, with the same nonce.

The messages are assigned arbitrary values for binary encoding:

pub const PING_MSG_TYPE: u8 = 0xfe;
pub const PONG_MSG_TYPE: u8 = 0xff;

All communication is encrypted with SV2 Noise Protocol.

github-actions · 2024-06-26T20:37:12Z

Bencher

Report	Sun, July 28, 2024 at 20:36:18 UTC
Project	Stratum v2 (SRI)
Branch	refactor-ping-pong-encrypted
Testbed	sv2

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	Latency Results nanoseconds (ns) \| (Δ%)	Latency Upper Boundary nanoseconds (ns) \| (%)
client_sv2_handle_message_common	✅ (view plot)	44.87 (+0.69%)	45.25 (99.16%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining	✅ (view plot)	74.78 (+2.61%)	80.41 (93.00%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard	✅ (view plot)	14.66 (+0.04%)	14.69 (99.78%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize	✅ (view plot)	270.91 (+2.37%)	284.44 (95.24%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize	✅ (view plot)	599.18 (+0.80%)	627.97 (95.42%)
client_sv2_open_channel	✅ (view plot)	168.47 (+1.48%)	173.54 (97.08%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize	✅ (view plot)	274.99 (-2.82%)	293.43 (93.72%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize	✅ (view plot)	377.55 (-0.21%)	423.91 (89.06%)
client_sv2_setup_connection	✅ (view plot)	171.04 (+4.12%)	175.19 (97.63%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize	✅ (view plot)	451.86 (-4.65%)	506.78 (89.16%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize	✅ (view plot)	966.76 (-0.45%)	1,039.00 (93.05%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

github-actions · 2024-06-26T20:37:16Z

Bencher

Report	Sun, July 28, 2024 at 20:36:27 UTC
Project	Stratum v2 (SRI)
Branch	refactor-ping-pong-encrypted
Testbed	sv2

🚨 11 ALERTS: Threshold Boundary Limits exceeded!

Benchmark	Measure (units)	View	Value	Upper Boundary
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard	L2 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	26.00 (+47.32%)	23.31 (111.55%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize	L2 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	55.00 (+15.97%)	52.78 (104.21%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize	Instructions (instructions)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	10,585.00 (+0.40%)	10,567.30 (100.17%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize	L1 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	15,400.00 (+0.38%)	15,373.90 (100.17%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize	L2 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	90.00 (+7.36%)	89.73 (100.30%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize	Instructions (instructions)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	8,027.00 (+0.53%)	8,009.69 (100.22%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize	L1 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	11,673.00 (+0.50%)	11,648.71 (100.21%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize	L2 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	84.00 (+14.29%)	82.57 (101.73%)
client_sv2_setup_connection	L2 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	15.00 (+63.31%)	13.96 (107.42%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize	Instructions (instructions)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	14,855.00 (+0.29%)	14,837.01 (100.12%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize	L1 Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	21,812.00 (+0.28%)	21,785.52 (100.12%)

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Estimated Cycles	Estimated Cycles Results estimated cycles \| (Δ%)	Estimated Cycles Upper Boundary estimated cycles \| (%)	Instructions	Instructions Results instructions \| (Δ%)	Instructions Upper Boundary instructions \| (%)	L1 Accesses	L1 Accesses Results accesses \| (Δ%)	L1 Accesses Upper Boundary accesses \| (%)	L2 Accesses	L2 Accesses Results accesses \| (Δ%)	L2 Accesses Upper Boundary accesses \| (%)	RAM Accesses	RAM Accesses Results accesses \| (Δ%)	RAM Accesses Upper Boundary accesses \| (%)
client_sv2_handle_message_common	✅ (view plot)	2,077.00 (+1.32%)	2,127.28 (97.64%)	✅ (view plot)	473.00 (+0.49%)	486.40 (97.25%)	✅ (view plot)	732.00 (-0.02%)	755.23 (96.92%)	✅ (view plot)	10.00 (+42.86%)	10.89 (91.86%)	✅ (view plot)	37.00 (+0.96%)	38.56 (95.97%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining	✅ (view plot)	8,219.00 (+0.27%)	8,336.65 (98.59%)	✅ (view plot)	2,137.00 (+0.46%)	2,171.37 (98.42%)	✅ (view plot)	3,159.00 (+0.46%)	3,216.13 (98.22%)	✅ (view plot)	39.00 (+1.20%)	43.61 (89.43%)	✅ (view plot)	139.00 (+0.11%)	141.98 (97.90%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard	✅ (view plot)	6,282.00 (+0.10%)	6,388.45 (98.33%)	✅ (view plot)	1,750.00 (+0.03%)	1,763.19 (99.25%)	✅ (view plot)	2,547.00 (-0.26%)	2,575.91 (98.88%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	26.00 (+47.32%)	23.31 (111.55%)	✅ (view plot)	103.00 (-0.78%)	106.90 (96.35%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize	✅ (view plot)	14,623.00 (-1.01%)	15,034.91 (97.26%)	✅ (view plot)	4,694.00 (+0.01%)	4,707.19 (99.72%)	✅ (view plot)	6,753.00 (-0.02%)	6,775.28 (99.67%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	55.00 (+15.97%)	52.78 (104.21%)	✅ (view plot)	217.00 (-2.39%)	230.03 (94.33%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize	✅ (view plot)	27,435.00 (-0.15%)	27,843.64 (98.53%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	10,585.00 (+0.40%)	10,567.30 (100.17%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	15,400.00 (+0.38%)	15,373.90 (100.17%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	90.00 (+7.36%)	89.73 (100.30%)	✅ (view plot)	331.00 (-1.12%)	345.31 (95.86%)
client_sv2_open_channel	✅ (view plot)	4,417.00 (-1.64%)	4,611.35 (95.79%)	✅ (view plot)	1,461.00 (+0.06%)	1,474.45 (99.09%)	✅ (view plot)	2,157.00 (+0.20%)	2,173.04 (99.26%)	✅ (view plot)	11.00 (-8.05%)	15.23 (72.23%)	✅ (view plot)	63.00 (-3.21%)	68.19 (92.39%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize	✅ (view plot)	14,006.00 (-1.46%)	14,464.68 (96.83%)	✅ (view plot)	5,064.00 (+0.02%)	5,077.45 (99.74%)	✅ (view plot)	7,321.00 (+0.04%)	7,339.34 (99.75%)	✅ (view plot)	42.00 (+12.44%)	42.27 (99.37%)	✅ (view plot)	185.00 (-3.49%)	199.03 (92.95%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize	✅ (view plot)	22,523.00 (-0.51%)	23,023.79 (97.82%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	8,027.00 (+0.53%)	8,009.69 (100.22%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	11,673.00 (+0.50%)	11,648.71 (100.21%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	84.00 (+14.29%)	82.57 (101.73%)	✅ (view plot)	298.00 (-2.12%)	315.05 (94.59%)
client_sv2_setup_connection	✅ (view plot)	4,659.00 (-0.82%)	4,765.03 (97.77%)	✅ (view plot)	1,502.00 (+0.05%)	1,515.45 (99.11%)	✅ (view plot)	2,274.00 (-0.12%)	2,299.70 (98.88%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	15.00 (+63.31%)	13.96 (107.42%)	✅ (view plot)	66.00 (-2.73%)	69.68 (94.72%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize	✅ (view plot)	15,942.00 (-1.95%)	16,503.87 (96.60%)	✅ (view plot)	5,963.00 (+0.01%)	5,976.45 (99.77%)	✅ (view plot)	8,662.00 (+0.08%)	8,677.81 (99.82%)	✅ (view plot)	49.00 (+9.61%)	49.21 (99.57%)	✅ (view plot)	201.00 (-4.68%)	217.96 (92.22%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize	✅ (view plot)	35,382.00 (-0.42%)	35,749.07 (98.97%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	14,855.00 (+0.29%)	14,837.01 (100.12%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	21,812.00 (+0.28%)	21,785.52 (100.12%)	✅ (view plot)	110.00 (+10.20%)	113.21 (97.16%)	✅ (view plot)	372.00 (-1.96%)	384.91 (96.65%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

github-actions · 2024-06-26T20:37:25Z

Bencher

Report	Sun, July 28, 2024 at 20:36:24 UTC
Project	Stratum v2 (SRI)
Branch	1007/merge
Testbed	sv1

🚨 1 ALERT: Threshold Boundary Limit exceeded!

Benchmark	Measure (units)	View	Value	Lower Boundary	Upper Boundary
client-sv1-get-subscribe/client-sv1-get-subscribe	Latency (nanoseconds (ns))	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	296.59 (+6.26%)		293.24 (101.14%)

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	Latency Results nanoseconds (ns) \| (Δ%)	Latency Upper Boundary nanoseconds (ns) \| (%)
client-submit-serialize	✅ (view plot)	6,500.30 (-6.19%)	7,349.35 (88.45%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize	✅ (view plot)	7,470.10 (-4.84%)	8,328.83 (89.69%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle	✅ (view plot)	8,061.40 (-4.23%)	8,839.34 (91.20%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle	✅ (view plot)	889.16 (-1.01%)	926.61 (95.96%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize	✅ (view plot)	693.05 (-0.55%)	717.83 (96.55%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize	✅ (view plot)	245.98 (-0.85%)	255.18 (96.40%)
client-sv1-get-authorize/client-sv1-get-authorize	✅ (view plot)	157.21 (+0.03%)	162.46 (96.77%)
client-sv1-get-submit	✅ (view plot)	6,390.00 (-4.58%)	7,134.55 (89.56%)
client-sv1-get-subscribe/client-sv1-get-subscribe	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	296.59 (+6.26%)	293.24 (101.14%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle	✅ (view plot)	765.45 (+2.41%)	777.22 (98.49%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize	✅ (view plot)	608.36 (-0.95%)	637.59 (95.42%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize	✅ (view plot)	203.19 (-1.66%)	219.99 (92.36%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

github-actions · 2024-06-26T20:37:31Z

Bencher

Report	Sun, July 28, 2024 at 20:36:20 UTC
Project	Stratum v2 (SRI)
Branch	refactor-ping-pong-encrypted
Testbed	sv1

🚨 2 ALERTS: Threshold Boundary Limits exceeded!

Benchmark	Measure (units)	View	Value	Lower Boundary	Upper Boundary
serialize_deserialize_authorize	RAM Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	298.00 (+1.06%)		297.85 (100.05%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_authorize	RAM Accesses (accesses)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	369.00 (+1.40%)		367.32 (100.46%)

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Estimated Cycles	Estimated Cycles Results estimated cycles \| (Δ%)	Estimated Cycles Upper Boundary estimated cycles \| (%)	Instructions	Instructions Results instructions \| (Δ%)	Instructions Upper Boundary instructions \| (%)	L1 Accesses	L1 Accesses Results accesses \| (Δ%)	L1 Accesses Upper Boundary accesses \| (%)	L2 Accesses	L2 Accesses Results accesses \| (Δ%)	L2 Accesses Upper Boundary accesses \| (%)	RAM Accesses	RAM Accesses Results accesses \| (Δ%)	RAM Accesses Upper Boundary accesses \| (%)
get_authorize	✅ (view plot)	8,504.00 (+0.81%)	8,725.53 (97.46%)	✅ (view plot)	3,746.00 (+0.15%)	3,855.71 (97.15%)	✅ (view plot)	5,249.00 (+0.08%)	5,402.12 (97.17%)	✅ (view plot)	7.00 (-11.90%)	10.40 (67.31%)	✅ (view plot)	92.00 (+2.18%)	94.03 (97.84%)
get_submit	✅ (view plot)	95,475.00 (-0.08%)	96,143.54 (99.30%)	✅ (view plot)	59,439.00 (-0.05%)	59,779.65 (99.43%)	✅ (view plot)	85,360.00 (-0.05%)	85,838.02 (99.44%)	✅ (view plot)	49.00 (-11.09%)	62.58 (78.30%)	✅ (view plot)	282.00 (-0.03%)	287.71 (98.01%)
get_subscribe	✅ (view plot)	7,957.00 (-0.25%)	8,271.33 (96.20%)	✅ (view plot)	2,841.00 (+0.39%)	2,940.12 (96.63%)	✅ (view plot)	3,972.00 (+0.46%)	4,099.98 (96.88%)	✅ (view plot)	13.00 (-19.66%)	19.82 (65.60%)	✅ (view plot)	112.00 (-0.56%)	116.95 (95.77%)
serialize_authorize	✅ (view plot)	12,257.00 (+0.42%)	12,503.93 (98.03%)	✅ (view plot)	5,317.00 (+0.11%)	5,426.71 (97.98%)	✅ (view plot)	7,412.00 (+0.06%)	7,565.46 (97.97%)	✅ (view plot)	10.00 (-7.41%)	13.38 (74.73%)	✅ (view plot)	137.00 (+1.06%)	140.24 (97.69%)
serialize_deserialize_authorize	✅ (view plot)	24,554.00 (+0.34%)	24,709.48 (99.37%)	✅ (view plot)	9,898.00 (-0.02%)	10,026.68 (98.72%)	✅ (view plot)	13,959.00 (-0.05%)	14,151.77 (98.64%)	✅ (view plot)	33.00 (-9.79%)	41.62 (79.29%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	298.00 (+1.06%)	297.85 (100.05%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_authorize	✅ (view plot)	30,335.00 (+0.62%)	30,348.92 (99.95%)	✅ (view plot)	12,101.00 (+0.05%)	12,210.71 (99.10%)	✅ (view plot)	17,115.00 (-0.01%)	17,280.53 (99.04%)	✅ (view plot)	61.00 (+3.71%)	64.77 (94.18%)	🚨 (view plot \| view alert)	369.00 (+1.40%)	367.32 (100.46%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_submit	✅ (view plot)	126,406.00 (-0.00%)	127,033.73 (99.51%)	✅ (view plot)	73,224.00 (-0.04%)	73,621.57 (99.46%)	✅ (view plot)	104,946.00 (-0.04%)	105,513.86 (99.46%)	✅ (view plot)	120.00 (-0.42%)	131.31 (91.38%)	✅ (view plot)	596.00 (+0.19%)	599.24 (99.46%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_subscribe	✅ (view plot)	27,503.00 (+0.17%)	27,603.14 (99.64%)	✅ (view plot)	9,643.00 (+0.12%)	9,742.12 (98.98%)	✅ (view plot)	13,638.00 (+0.11%)	13,775.88 (99.00%)	✅ (view plot)	64.00 (-2.92%)	73.80 (86.72%)	✅ (view plot)	387.00 (+0.31%)	388.59 (99.59%)
serialize_deserialize_submit	✅ (view plot)	114,999.00 (-0.07%)	115,655.20 (99.43%)	✅ (view plot)	68,001.00 (-0.08%)	68,404.14 (99.41%)	✅ (view plot)	97,559.00 (-0.09%)	98,152.61 (99.40%)	✅ (view plot)	65.00 (-6.39%)	75.30 (86.32%)	✅ (view plot)	489.00 (+0.18%)	492.39 (99.31%)
serialize_deserialize_subscribe	✅ (view plot)	22,888.00 (+0.06%)	23,112.00 (99.03%)	✅ (view plot)	8,195.00 (+0.11%)	8,297.86 (98.76%)	✅ (view plot)	11,543.00 (+0.12%)	11,683.32 (98.80%)	✅ (view plot)	36.00 (-8.63%)	44.09 (81.65%)	✅ (view plot)	319.00 (+0.15%)	321.50 (99.22%)
serialize_submit	✅ (view plot)	99,792.00 (-0.10%)	100,471.79 (99.32%)	✅ (view plot)	61,483.00 (-0.05%)	61,829.06 (99.44%)	✅ (view plot)	88,207.00 (-0.05%)	88,691.57 (99.45%)	✅ (view plot)	49.00 (-12.04%)	62.30 (78.65%)	✅ (view plot)	324.00 (-0.21%)	329.20 (98.42%)
serialize_subscribe	✅ (view plot)	11,294.00 (-0.29%)	11,607.24 (97.30%)	✅ (view plot)	4,188.00 (+0.27%)	4,287.12 (97.69%)	✅ (view plot)	5,829.00 (+0.29%)	5,959.20 (97.82%)	✅ (view plot)	15.00 (-8.33%)	18.98 (79.05%)	✅ (view plot)	154.00 (-0.78%)	159.77 (96.39%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

Shourya742

tACK e37608e. There are just a few nits.

examples/ping-pong-encrypted/src/server.rs

examples/ping-pong-encrypted/src/client.rs

average-gary

LGTM.

plebhash · 2024-07-03T14:02:12Z

reverting back to draft, since it could be affected by #903 (and other similar issues that are output from #845 )

rrybarczyk · 2024-07-17T13:54:31Z

Note: Wait to merge until the following is merged:

codecov · 2025-01-27T15:37:01Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19.20%. Comparing base (62104a4) to head (db38bf4).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1007   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   19.20%   19.20%           
=======================================
  Files         166      166           
  Lines       11107    11107           
=======================================
  Hits         2133     2133           
  Misses       8974     8974

Flag	Coverage Δ
binary_codec_sv2-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
binary_serde_sv2-coverage	`3.55% <ø> (ø)`
binary_sv2-coverage	`5.34% <ø> (ø)`
bip32_derivation-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
buffer_sv2-coverage	`25.02% <ø> (ø)`
codec_sv2-coverage	`0.01% <ø> (ø)`
common_messages_sv2-coverage	`0.13% <ø> (ø)`
const_sv2-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
error_handling-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
framing_sv2-coverage	`0.28% <ø> (ø)`
jd_client-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
jd_server-coverage	`7.79% <ø> (ø)`
job_declaration_sv2-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
key-utils-coverage	`2.39% <ø> (ø)`
mining-coverage	`2.44% <ø> (ø)`
mining_device-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
mining_proxy_sv2-coverage	`0.70% <ø> (ø)`
noise_sv2-coverage	`4.44% <ø> (ø)`
pool_sv2-coverage	`2.04% <ø> (ø)`
protocols	`24.74% <ø> (ø)`
roles	`6.54% <ø> (ø)`
roles_logic_sv2-coverage	`9.06% <ø> (ø)`
sv2_ffi-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
template_distribution_sv2-coverage	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
translator_sv2-coverage	`9.60% <ø> (ø)`
utils	`25.13% <ø> (ø)`
v1-coverage	`2.41% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

plebhash · 2025-01-27T15:37:28Z

reverting back to draft, since it could be affected by #903 (and other similar issues that are output from #845 )

Note: Wait to merge until the following is merged:

Framing refactor: test Sv2Frame and HandShakeFrame #1049

Framing refactor: framing.rs api #1033

the tasks mentioned above have been de-prioritized

@Shourya742 is working to remove async_std support from SRI, and this PR helps achieve that goal

therefore, I'm removing the draft status so we can merge this soon

GitGab19

tACK

Co-authored-by: bit-aloo <84662239+Shourya742@users.noreply.github.com>

plebhash force-pushed the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch from 56af371 to d228ec2 Compare June 26, 2024 20:34

plebhash force-pushed the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch 8 times, most recently from 1da5329 to e37608e Compare June 26, 2024 21:12

Shourya742 suggested changes Jun 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

examples/ping-pong-encrypted/src/server.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

examples/ping-pong-encrypted/src/client.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

average-gary reviewed Jun 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

examples/ping-pong-encrypted/src/client.rs Show resolved Hide resolved

average-gary approved these changes Jun 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

plebhash force-pushed the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch 2 times, most recently from aa1ad0c to 5f67449 Compare June 29, 2024 01:09

plebhash marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2024 14:02

pavlenex added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Jul 3, 2024

plebhash mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2024

Enhance SetupConnection Handling and Implement Job declaration Flag Checks #1035

Merged

plebhash force-pushed the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch from 5f67449 to 4aa8c14 Compare July 28, 2024 20:28

plebhash removed this from the 1.1.0 milestone Aug 20, 2024

plebhash changed the base branch from dev to main August 28, 2024 20:17

plebhash force-pushed the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch from 4aa8c14 to 93ade48 Compare January 27, 2025 15:34

plebhash marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2025 15:35

plebhash mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2025

remove async_std support #1402

Open

plebhash force-pushed the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch from 93ade48 to 0a8ec48 Compare January 29, 2025 20:18

GitGab19 approved these changes Jan 30, 2025

View reviewed changes

plebhash added the ready-to-be-merged triggers auto rebase bot label Jan 30, 2025

ping-pong-encrypted example

db38bf4

Co-authored-by: bit-aloo <84662239+Shourya742@users.noreply.github.com>

plebhash force-pushed the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch from 0a8ec48 to db38bf4 Compare January 30, 2025 14:07

plebhash merged commit 84dbb48 into stratum-mining:main Jan 30, 2025
33 checks passed

plebhash deleted the refactor-ping-pong-encrypted branch January 30, 2025 14:49

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Refactor ping pong encrypted example #1007

Refactor ping pong encrypted example #1007

plebhash commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Shourya742 left a comment

average-gary left a comment

plebhash commented Jul 3, 2024

rrybarczyk commented Jul 17, 2024

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

plebhash commented Jan 27, 2025

GitGab19 left a comment

Refactor ping pong encrypted example #1007

Refactor ping pong encrypted example #1007

Conversation

plebhash commented Jun 26, 2024 • edited Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Bencher

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Bencher

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Bencher

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Bencher

Shourya742 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

average-gary left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

plebhash commented Jul 3, 2024

rrybarczyk commented Jul 17, 2024

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2025 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

plebhash commented Jan 27, 2025

GitGab19 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

plebhash commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading