-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(all):support for considering all workflows with one term #165
feat(all):support for considering all workflows with one term #165
Conversation
e6a6dcc
to
631502d
Compare
631502d
to
b1d5a4c
Compare
@styfle Please review this PR |
@styfle Can you please have a look at this PR |
@styfle Please check this PR |
@anshulsahni I'm not even the maintainer here, just listening on the repo and I find your repeated comments irritating. Just fork the repo and use your fork, or have some patience. It's open source, maintainers don't have endless time and can't drop everything at once to handle your review, right? |
Sure @mikehardy, but you can always unwatch the PRs & be nice to others Anyway thanks for the advice |
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Update the version to `0.10.0` where `workflow_id` accepts the `all` value in #165.
What is the requirement?
Support for a workflow_id value
all
which will capture all the workflowsWhat are the detailed changes?
workflow_id=all
Fixes: #54