Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: recursion optimizations #1781

Open
wants to merge 55 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: recursion optimizations #1781

wants to merge 55 commits into from

Conversation

jtguibas
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

tamirhemo and others added 26 commits September 5, 2024 14:44
* working with the 'pass-through' method

* cleanup

* making clippy happy
* drop record span

* drop in thread
* add execute mode

* Update crates/perf/src/main.rs

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* working

* wip

* wip

* wip

* semi-working shrink

* working shrink

* added precompile computaitons

* slightly better tuned shapes

* clippy

* working to do no precompile shapes too

* docker

* switched order of shapes

* comments

* cached programs

* remove singleton proofs from cache

* comment out building the chips

* pre-dev-merge

* refactored max core plus precompile

* near final draft

* almost there

* ready for review
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 11, 2024

SP1 Performance Test Results

Branch: john/latest-wip-changes
Commit: c47e05d
Author: jtguibas

program cycles execute (mHz) core (kHZ) compress (KHz) time success
fibonacci 11291 0.17 2.92 0.71 16s
ssz-withdrawals 2757356 17.42 127.81 58.95 47s
tendermint 12593597 6.70 269.97 142.88 1m30s

@jtguibas jtguibas changed the title feat: v4 rc1 feat: recursion optimizations Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants