Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(visit): Simplify Vec::move_map #8838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

dsherret
Copy link
Contributor

Description: Simplifies the move_map implementation.

Related issue (if exists): None.

@dsherret dsherret requested a review from a team as a code owner April 10, 2024 15:23
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 1cc90bd

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Member

@kdy1 kdy1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

swc-bump:

  • swc_visit

@kdy1 kdy1 changed the title refactor: Simplify move_map implementation refactor(visit): Simplify Vec::move_map Apr 10, 2024
@kdy1 kdy1 enabled auto-merge (squash) April 10, 2024 23:00
@kdy1 kdy1 added this to the Planned milestone Apr 10, 2024
@kdy1 kdy1 merged commit b1973d4 into swc-project:main Apr 10, 2024
141 checks passed
@dsherret dsherret deleted the refactor_move_map branch April 11, 2024 00:25
@kdy1 kdy1 modified the milestones: Planned, 1.4.14 Apr 15, 2024
@swc-project swc-project locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants