Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: add the ability to pass in SwiftCollections #419

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2021

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

This allows building against SwiftCollections from a build tree when
building with SwiftPM from a build tree.

This allows building against SwiftCollections from a build tree when
building with SwiftPM from a build tree.
@compnerd compnerd requested a review from benlangmuir as a code owner July 21, 2021 00:26
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

CC: @tomerd
This is related to swiftlang/swift-package-manager#3595

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@tomerd
Copy link
Contributor

tomerd commented Jul 21, 2021

seems fine to me

@tomerd
Copy link
Contributor

tomerd commented Jul 21, 2021

we are likely to rollback the SwiftPM change, but lets keep this open when we are ready to roll forward again

cc @neonichu

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

I think that we should merge this we are holding off on swiftlang/swift-package-manager#3628 (CC: @tomerd)

@benlangmuir
Copy link
Contributor

@compnerd to confirm my cmake understanding: this will not cause any errors if collections is not found and is not needed (due to QUIET and not having REQUIRED)? If so, I agree there is no downside to merging this PR

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@benlangmuir precisely - this allows us to build SK-LSP with and without a build tree.

@benlangmuir benlangmuir merged commit 7c9ccf2 into swiftlang:main Jul 22, 2021
@compnerd compnerd deleted the collections branch July 22, 2021 22:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants