[RemoteMirror] Fix generic depth calculation #75587
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The "generic depth" is used to match up generic type variables.
For example:
```
struct Foo<T> { // `T` at generic depth 0
struct Bar {
struct Baz<U> { // 'U' at generic depth 1
...
}}}
```
Note in the above that `Bar` is not counted in the
generic depth. The previous logic did count `Bar` in
the generic depth calculation, leading to mismatches
when trying to associate references to generic variables.
This adds a new test with cases like the above and of course
corrects the calculation.
Resolves rdar://127450037
|
@swift-ci Please test |
mikeash
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
augusto2112
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
|
@swift-ci Please test macOS Platform |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "generic depth" is used to match up generic type variables. For example:
Note in the above that
Baris not counted in the generic depth. The previous logic did countBarin the generic depth calculation, leading to mismatches when trying to associate references to generic variables.This adds a new test with cases like the above and of course corrects the calculation.
Resolves rdar://127450037