-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(rfq-relayer): regenerate with updated fastbridgev2 and zap terminology [SLT-442] #3394
Merged
dwasse
merged 5 commits into
feat/relayer-arb-call
from
feat/relayer-arb-call-zap-merge
Nov 14, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
1,097 changes: 877 additions & 220 deletions
1,097
services/rfq/contracts/fastbridgev2/fastbridgev2.abigen.go
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
services/rfq/contracts/fastbridgev2/fastbridgev2.contractinfo.json
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
746 changes: 626 additions & 120 deletions
746
services/rfq/contracts/testcontracts/fastbridgemockv2/fastbridgemockv2.abigen.go
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
services/rfq/contracts/testcontracts/fastbridgemockv2/fastbridgemockv2.contractinfo.json
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
224 changes: 123 additions & 101 deletions
224
services/rfq/contracts/testcontracts/recipientmock/recipientmock.abigen.go
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
services/rfq/contracts/testcontracts/recipientmock/recipientmock.contractinfo.json
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage for new Zap fields
The test data initializes
ZapNative
to zero andZapData
to empty, which might not adequately exercise the new functionality. Consider adding test cases that cover:ZapNative
valuesZapData
payloadsHere's a suggested enhancement to the test data: