Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[aot] Load AOT module from memory (#6692) #6714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member

Reverts #6704

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 23, 2022

Deploy Preview for docsite-preview canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 96499be
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docsite-preview/deploys/6380c7fa0d14ed00091e0fa1

@PENGUINLIONG PENGUINLIONG changed the title [aot] Revert "[aot] Revert "Load AOT module from memory (#6692)"" [aot] Revert "Revert "Load AOT module from memory (#6692)"" Nov 23, 2022
@PENGUINLIONG PENGUINLIONG changed the title [aot] Revert "Revert "Load AOT module from memory (#6692)"" [aot] Load AOT module from memory (#6692) Nov 23, 2022
@PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase

1 similar comment
@PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase

@PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase

1 similar comment
@PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase

@PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase

@PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase

@PENGUINLIONG
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase

Copy link
Contributor

@ailzhang ailzhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ailzhang ailzhang merged commit 489205c into master Nov 28, 2022
@ailzhang ailzhang deleted the revert-6704-revert/aot branch November 28, 2022 04:03
quadpixels pushed a commit to quadpixels/taichi that referenced this pull request May 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants