Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(protocol): improve liveness bond calculation to discourage empty block spamming #18769

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

feat(protocol): improve liveness bond calculation to discourage empty block spamming #18769

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

dantaik
Copy link
Contributor

@dantaik dantaik commented Jan 14, 2025

Now the liveness bond per batch is (bond_per_batch + bond_per_block * num_blocks)

@dantaik dantaik marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2025 14:07
@openzeppelin-code OpenZeppelin Code
Copy link

openzeppelin-code bot commented Jan 14, 2025 •
edited
Loading

feat(protocol): improve liveness bond calculation to discourage empty block spamming

Generated at commit: cdcd5bcab2bbda965fb7b2bd84913224873232b0

🚨 Report Summary

Severity Level Results
Contracts Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total		 3
3
0
10
40
56
Dependencies Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total		 0
0
0
0
0
0

For more details view the full report in OpenZeppelin Code Inspector

@dantaik dantaik requested a review from davidtaikocha January 14, 2025 15:07
@dantaik dantaik merged commit 839804d into pacaya_fork Jan 15, 2025
5 checks passed
@dantaik dantaik deleted the pacaya_fork_liveness_bond_per_block branch January 15, 2025 07:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xiaodino xiaodino xiaodino approved these changes

@davidtaikocha davidtaikocha davidtaikocha approved these changes

@AnshuJalan AnshuJalan Awaiting requested review from AnshuJalan

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@dantaik @davidtaikocha @xiaodino