Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tyler refactor debuglog #3

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

TylerYang
Copy link

@TylerYang TylerYang commented Dec 11, 2017

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@targos
Copy link
Owner

targos commented Dec 11, 2017

Hi, could you please open the PR against the main Node repo?
You should be able to do that from this page: nodejs/node@master...TylerYang:tyler-refactor-debuglog

@TylerYang
Copy link
Author

TylerYang commented Dec 11, 2017

Sure, thx : ) Just posted nodejs#17609

@targos targos closed this Dec 12, 2017
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
Remove a pointless adapter frame  by fixing up the function's formal
parameter count.  Before:

    frame #0: 0x000033257ea446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x000033257ea3b93f <adaptor>
    frame #2: 0x000033257ea41959 <internal>
    frame #3: 0x000033257e9840ff <entry>

After:

    frame #0: 0x00000956287446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x0000095628741959 <internal>
    frame #2: 0x00000956286840ff <entry>

PR-URL: nodejs#17693
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
Remove a pointless adapter frame  by fixing up the function's formal
parameter count.  Before:

    frame #0: 0x000033257ea446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x000033257ea3b93f <adaptor>
    frame #2: 0x000033257ea41959 <internal>
    frame #3: 0x000033257e9840ff <entry>

After:

    frame #0: 0x00000956287446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x0000095628741959 <internal>
    frame #2: 0x00000956286840ff <entry>

PR-URL: nodejs#17693
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
Remove a pointless adapter frame  by fixing up the function's formal
parameter count.  Before:

    frame #0: 0x000033257ea446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x000033257ea3b93f <adaptor>
    frame #2: 0x000033257ea41959 <internal>
    frame #3: 0x000033257e9840ff <entry>

After:

    frame #0: 0x00000956287446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x0000095628741959 <internal>
    frame #2: 0x00000956286840ff <entry>

PR-URL: nodejs#17693
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2018
Remove a pointless adapter frame  by fixing up the function's formal
parameter count.  Before:

    frame #0: 0x000033257ea446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x000033257ea3b93f <adaptor>
    frame #2: 0x000033257ea41959 <internal>
    frame #3: 0x000033257e9840ff <entry>

After:

    frame #0: 0x00000956287446d5 onParserExecute(...)
    frame #1: 0x0000095628741959 <internal>
    frame #2: 0x00000956286840ff <entry>

PR-URL: nodejs#17693
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants