Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Update and optimise workflows before syncing them across tazama-lf repos #12

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

scott45
Copy link
Contributor

@scott45 scott45 commented Nov 29, 2024

SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0

What did we change?

  • This PR cleans up workflows that aren't general to all repos
  • Adds repos in tazama-lf repo to sync-workflow file
  • Tests npm automated publishing
  • Rename dockerhub-image-build workflow to a more general name and exclude dockerhub-image-build workflow from specific github repositories
  • Sets some of cicd working group objectives

Why are we doing this?

CI/CI recon

How was it tested?

  • Locally
  • Development Environment
  • Not needed, changes very basic
  • Husky successfully run
  • Unit tests passing and Documentation done

@scott45 scott45 self-assigned this Nov 29, 2024
@scott45 scott45 changed the title Update workflows Fix: Update workflows Nov 29, 2024
@scott45 scott45 changed the title Fix: Update workflows fix: Update workflows Nov 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 29, 2024
.github/workflows/publish.yml Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
@scott45 scott45 changed the title fix: Update workflows fix: Update and optimise workflows before syncing them across tazama-lf repos Nov 29, 2024
@Justus-at-Tazama Justus-at-Tazama merged commit 61b8112 into dev Nov 29, 2024
12 of 16 checks passed
@Justus-at-Tazama Justus-at-Tazama deleted the update-workflows branch November 29, 2024 06:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants