Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

edit original post #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2015
Merged

edit original post #2

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2015

Conversation

tbg
Copy link
Owner

@tbg tbg commented Dec 14, 2015

hopefully making it better.

Review on Reviewable

@@ -22,87 +31,77 @@ func main() {
}
```

Looks about as innocuous as nonsensical, right? If we run it naively, nothing happens:
Looks about as innocuous as nonsensical, right? If we run it naively, nothing

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/as nonsensical/as it is nonsensical/g

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:15 AM Peter Mattis notifications@github.com
wrote:

In cgo_libc_static/README.md
#2 (comment):

@@ -22,87 +31,77 @@ func main() {
}


-Looks about as innocuous as nonsensical, right? If we run it naively, nothing happens:
+Looks about as innocuous as nonsensical, right? If we run it naively, nothing

s/as nonsensical/as it is nonsensical/g


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/tschottdorf/goplay/pull/2/files#r47658032.

@petermattis
Copy link

LGTM

@@ -111,26 +110,27 @@ fatal error: unexpected signal during runtime execution
goroutine 3890 [syscall, locked to thread]:
runtime.cgocall(0x44c7f0, 0xc82036a8d8, 0xc800000000)
/usr/local/go/src/runtime/cgocall.go:120 +0x11b fp=0xc82036a888 sp=0xc82036a858
os/user._Cfunc_mygetpwuid_r(0x0, 0xc8203a8390, 0x7f3c5c000a10, 0x400, 0xc8200e4058, 0x7f3c00000000)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't remove this, this is the symbol you'd actually find in the symbol table

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, good point. Reinstating.

tbg added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2015
@tbg tbg merged commit 64eb99a into master Dec 16, 2015
@tbg tbg deleted the blog_edit branch December 16, 2015 04:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants