meta: make "new feature" issue template clearer #1687
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
ljharb
reviewed
Sep 5, 2019
ljharb
changed the title
Make this more clearer can help to prevent the 'close issues' from recurring. Better is not assume that the error is always from the user who has not read or not interpret properly. If the number of 'close issues' does not decrease, we will have data to say that the text is still bad and could improve even further. To learn more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copywriting
add optional comma Co-Authored-By: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
|
Closing as this has been subsumed by #1911, which made it so there is no longer a template whose existence implies that feature requests go in this repository. @Gurigraphics, thanks for this PR, and feel free to open a new one if you think the wording could use further improvement. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make this more clearer can help to prevent the 'close issues' from recurring.
Better is not assume that the error is always from the user who has not read or not interpret properly.
If the number of 'close issues' does not decrease, we will have data to say that the text is still bad and could improve even further.
To learn more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copywriting