-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spec text structure & Attempt at grammar #95
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks like a good initial outline. I'm looking forward to seeing more of it filled in. I guess there will need to be a section about Record/Tuple exotic objects analogous to https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-string-exotic-objects .
</emu-note> | ||
</emu-clause> | ||
<emu-clause id="sec-record-type"> | ||
<h1>Record type</h1> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Record value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@littledan It seems that it should be Record value here, but a "Record type" should be a "Record object" below
</emu-note> | ||
</emu-clause> | ||
<emu-clause id="sec-record-type"> | ||
<h1>Record type</h1> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@littledan It seems that it should be Record value here, but a "Record type" should be a "Record object" below
Co-Authored-By: Sergey Rubanov <chi187@gmail.com>
This PR structures the proposal's spec text around ECMA262's structure.
Additionally this creates a tentative grammar
Draft is up here: http://tc39.es/proposal-record-tuple/