Sonar issues #80
Sonar issues #80
Conversation
…f the expression.
…es every render. To fix this consider wrapping it in a useMemo hook.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@vidyaaKhandekar has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to several files within the React application, focusing on improving error handling, type safety, and performance optimizations. The rendering logic in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant App
participant RootElement
participant AuthProvider
participant TokenManager
participant ErrorHandler
App->>RootElement: Check for existence
alt Root Element exists
App->>AuthProvider: Render with context
AuthProvider->>TokenManager: Get token
TokenManager-->>AuthProvider: Return token
else Root Element missing
App->>ErrorHandler: Log error "Root element missing"
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/auth/asyncStorage.tsx (1)
Line range hint
50-54: Consider removing type assertionThe type assertion
as stringon line 53 could be unnecessary since we've already established the token is a string in the type definition. Consider removing it to maintain consistent type safety.- const decoded = jwtDecode<JwtPayload>(tokenResponse.token as string); + const decoded = jwtDecode<JwtPayload>(tokenResponse.token);src/utils/context/checkToken.tsx (1)
The review comment is incorrect - there is a design inconsistency between interfaces
The review comment mentions a
lengthproperty, but the actual issue is more significant. There are two different definitions of theUserDocumentinterface in the codebase:
- In
src/components/DocumentList.tsx- without thelengthproperty- In
src/utils/context/checkToken.tsx- with an optionallengthpropertyAdditionally, in
checkToken.tsx, theUserDatainterface declaresdocsas a singleUserDocument, but it's being used as an array inUserProfile.tsx(userData?.docs?.length).
src/utils/context/checkToken.tsx: Interface needs to be corrected to declaredocsasUserDocument[]- The two
UserDocumentinterface definitions should be consolidated into a single shared definition- The optional
lengthproperty should be removed as it's redundant for array types🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
22-36: Review UserDocument interface designThe
lengthproperty in the UserDocument interface is marked as optional and seems out of place. Consider if this property belongs in this interface or if it should be moved to a more appropriate type definition.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of length property in UserDocument rg "length.*UserDocument" rg -B 5 -A 5 "docs.*length"Length of output: 715
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual interface definition and its usages ast-grep --pattern 'interface UserDocument { $$$ }' # Also check for any other references to UserDocument rg "UserDocument" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 6353
src/services/auth/auth.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-300: Consider implementing refresh token rotation for better security.The authentication implementation could benefit from refresh token rotation, where a new refresh token is issued after each use. This helps prevent replay attacks.
Would you like me to provide guidance on implementing refresh token rotation?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/main.tsx(1 hunks)src/services/auth/asyncStorage.tsx(2 hunks)src/services/auth/auth.tsx(1 hunks)src/utils/context/checkToken.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main.tsx (1)
8-19: Good addition of null check for root element!
The added null check and error handling for the root element is a good improvement that prevents potential runtime errors. This addresses a common Sonar issue related to null pointer exceptions.
src/services/auth/asyncStorage.tsx (1)
16-16: Good improvement in type safety!
Changing the token type from string | unknown to string improves type safety and makes the code more predictable.
src/utils/context/checkToken.tsx (1)
96-109: Excellent performance optimization with useMemo!
The addition of useMemo for the context value is a great optimization that prevents unnecessary re-renders. The dependencies array is correctly specified with all required values.
src/services/auth/auth.tsx (1)
119-120: LGTM! Error handling change improves consistency.
The switch to using the centralized handleError function aligns with the error handling pattern used across other functions in the file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/common/input/Select.tsx (1)
49-50: Good improvement usingoption.valueas keyUsing
option.valueas the key instead of array index is a React best practice that improves rendering performance and state management. However, consider adding runtime validation to ensure option values are unique.Consider adding this validation:
const CustomSelect: React.FC<CustomSelectProps> = ({ options, placeholder = "Select an option", width = "60px", height = "35px", border = "1px solid var(--input-color)", placeholderStyle, }) => { + // Validate unique option values + React.useEffect(() => { + const values = options.map(opt => opt.value); + const uniqueValues = new Set(values); + if (values.length !== uniqueValues.size) { + console.warn('CustomSelect: Duplicate option values detected. Each option should have a unique value.'); + } + }, [options]); return (
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/common/input/Select.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/common/input/Select.tsx (2)
Line range hint 21-48: Well-structured component with good defaults and type safety
The component implementation shows good practices:
- Proper default values for visual properties
- Type-safe handling of optional styles
- Clean integration with Chakra UI
12-12: Verify the impact of making label optional
The change to make label optional improves component flexibility, but we should ensure this doesn't break existing usage.
Also applies to: 18-18
✅ Verification successful
Making label optional is safe and consistent with usage
The verification shows that:
- There's only one usage of
CustomSelectinNavbar.tsxwhere thelabelprop is properly provided - The component is not widely used across the codebase, minimizing potential impact
- The change aligns with the component's actual usage pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instances where CustomSelect is used without a label prop
ast-grep --pattern 'CustomSelect $$$' | rg -v 'label='
# Search for direct references to the label prop to ensure it's handled safely
ast-grep --pattern 'label={$_}'
Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of CustomSelect component
rg -l "CustomSelect" --type typescript --type tsx
# After finding the files, let's examine the actual usage
rg "CustomSelect" --type typescript --type tsx -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing CustomSelect
fd -e tsx -e ts | xargs rg "CustomSelect" -B 2 -A 2
# Also check if the component is exported and imported elsewhere
rg "import.*CustomSelect" -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 2566
|
Sonar issues
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CustomSelectcomponent with optional label and custom placeholder styles.Bug Fixes
Documentation