Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kb(validation): Add Custom Validator KB, enhance validation-related info #2466

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

dimodi
Copy link
Contributor

@dimodi dimodi commented Oct 24, 2024

No description provided.

@dimodi dimodi added the merge-to-production Use this label to get a comment to choose whether to merge the PR to production label Oct 24, 2024
@dimodi dimodi requested a review from a team October 24, 2024 14:19
@dimodi dimodi requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2024 14:19
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @dimodi,

Check the below option if you would like to automatically generate PR to production. The automation uses the branch for the cherry-pick, and then will delete the branch. Please, do not delete it manually.

  • create PR to production

@dimodi dimodi merged commit dbde182 into master Oct 25, 2024
1 check passed
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic cherry-pick & PR to production failed. Ping @telerik/blazor-admins for manual cherry-pick and push to production.

@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the kb-custom-validator branch October 25, 2024 20:13
dimodi added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2024
…nfo (#2466)

* kb(validation): Add KB for custom conditional required validator

* Explain built-in validation, polish KBs and links

* Add note

* Update knowledge-base/validation-custom-dataannotations-validator.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merge-to-production Use this label to get a comment to choose whether to merge the PR to production
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants