Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pg_partman 5 and pg17 tests for extension ci #308

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024
Merged

pg_partman 5 and pg17 tests for extension ci #308

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

ChuckHend
Copy link
Member

@ChuckHend ChuckHend commented Sep 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Run tests on pg_partman 4.7.3 and 5.1.0
  • Add tests for pg17

I will come back and update this to install pg_partman from pgxn once 5.1.0 is available in pgxn.

@ChuckHend ChuckHend marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2024 18:59
@ChuckHend ChuckHend changed the title pg_partman 5 tests for extension ci pg_partman 5 and pg17 tests for extension ci Sep 13, 2024
theory
theory approved these changes Sep 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@theory theory left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could just use the pg_partman in the step name.

.github/workflows/extension_ci.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
pgmq-extension/Makefile Show resolved Hide resolved
@ChuckHend ChuckHend merged commit 6fada6b into main Sep 13, 2024
18 checks passed
@ChuckHend ChuckHend deleted the partman5-tests branch September 13, 2024 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@theory theory theory approved these changes

@v0idpwn v0idpwn Awaiting requested review from v0idpwn v0idpwn is a code owner

@vrmiguel vrmiguel Awaiting requested review from vrmiguel vrmiguel is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ChuckHend @theory