regenerate mocks under client to allow dynamic returns based on arguments

[yinsidij]

What was changed

mocker for interfaces under client folder

Why?

Looks the mocks are old and only supports returning value rather than the function.
With updated mocker by latest mockery, (example https://github.com/temporalio/sdk-go/compare/master...yinsidij:yjiao/regenerate_mocks?expand=1#diff-baf21238e036d6550f43915acceadaf7448d1ff493453a0da0d41a232e20fa6fR217)
It allows dynamic return based on argument.

For example, with the newly generated mock, we could do following that provides more flexibility.

	mockClient.On("ExecuteWorkflow", mock.Anything, mock.AnythingOfType("internal.StartWorkflowOptions"), mock.AnythingOfType("string"), mock.Anything).Return(
		func(ctx context.Context, options client.StartWorkflowOptions, workflow string, newCustomerMetadata *datamodel.NewCustomerMetadata) (client.WorkflowRun, error) {
			if newCustomerMetadata.CustomerID == "bad" {
				return nil, fmt.Errorf("error")
			}
			return nil, nil
		},
	).Maybe()

Checklist

1. Closes

2. How was this tested:

3. Any docs updates needed?

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[cretz]

Please approve CLA and fix copyright headers of files

[yinsidij]

Please approve CLA and fix copyright headers of files

signed CLA and iterated the PR.

[yinsidij]

one CI job failed. somehow I cannot find a way to re trigger the job.

I locally ran this test and passed. Looks like rerun should be also resolve it.

Could you please help rerun the failed CI jobs?
@Quinn-With-Two-Ns @cretz

[Quinn-With-Two-Ns]

All these internal.* need to be replaced by the appropriate exposed type.

[yinsidij]

@Quinn-With-Two-Ns
thanks for review.
Actually internal.WorkflowRun is equivalent to client.WorkflowRun. FYI.

sdk-go/client/client.go

Line 100 in 41d2288

WorkflowRun = internal.WorkflowRun

I will still make the change

[yinsidij]

@Quinn-With-Two-Ns iterated. Not sure why build-and-test is not started. Is it just slow?

[Quinn-With-Two-Ns]

It requires manual approval

[Quinn-With-Two-Ns]

Thanks for the contribution

[yinsidij]

Only those with write access to this repository can merge pull requests.

Thanks. Looks like I don't have permission to merge. What is the process for merging the PR ?

And I have another PR that completes the all existing mockers under mockers using latest mockery. #1361

We can do two merges. But happy to help merge with one PR here if you think it's necessary.