-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure WorkflowTaskExecutionFailureCounter is called with a tag #1658
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the panics here are always caused just by non determinism, what is users workflow code panics because of a code bug?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also I am pretty sure we can still end up emitting emitting this metric twice , that should be addressed to close #1450
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From my testing, when a user's workflow code panics, we trigger the call in
internal_task_pollers.go
. The only way I saw us recover a panic from the defer call is when wepanicIllegalState
from the state machine. But to be safe, I can add a check to check the panic message forTMPRL1100
to useNonDeterminismError
and default toWorkflowError
for all other scenarios.Do you have any idea what scenario could cause this double logging? I've tried to hit this scenario the last few days and haven't been able to come up with anything.
The issue itself is on Prometheus erroring out due to the metric being emitted twice, once due to having a tag and the other without, which is now resolved with this PR (calling with different logs doesn't cause Prometheus to throw an error). But I'm happy to address this double logging, I'm just not able to find a scenario where we double log.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure let me try to come up with a counter example
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I got a scenario that hits both
ProcessEvent
andRespondTaskCompletedWithMetrics
. It looks like when both of these functions emit this metric, only theRespondTaskCompletedWithMetrics
inc gets counted.A few scenarios I ran:
RespondTaskCompletedWithMetrics
is the only one emitting the metric, the count is 1ProcessEvent
is the only one emitting the metric, the count is 0Is there some kind of scoping or something that's causing the earlier
ProcessEvent
metric to get reset? I'm using the metrics sample to emit metrics to localhost://9090/metrics https://github.com/yuandrew/playground/tree/duplicate_logging