Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove subpackage maintainer concept #2185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2020

Conversation

seanpmorgan
Copy link
Member

Description

The repo maintainers have discussed and we feel that the subpackage maintainer concept has grown stale. Originally we wanted to split subpackages amongst ourselves where small groups of maintainers would serve as the failsafe for given subpackages. In practice this meant every subpackage would have had a very limited amount of people who were ultimately responsible. This created unnecessary stress on maintainers to feel like they were required to keep working on the project in order for the subpackage to remain viable.

Ultimately all write access maintainers can help across the repo and have been doing so for an extended period of time. However, there is an added need for reliable submodule owners which is what we've discovered over the past few months. We'll be working on improving that system through #2024

Type of change

  • Updated or additional documentation

Checklist:

  • I've properly [formatted my code according to the guidelines]

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the github label Sep 29, 2020
@WindQAQ WindQAQ self-requested a review September 29, 2020 07:23
Copy link
Member

@WindQAQ WindQAQ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@WindQAQ WindQAQ merged commit 0701713 into tensorflow:master Sep 29, 2020
@seanpmorgan seanpmorgan deleted the remove-subpackage-owners branch September 29, 2020 13:43
jrruijli pushed a commit to jrruijli/addons that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants