Port over T3000 Model Tests over to Galaxy #11403
Comments
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 21, 2024
Key change to start enabling more T3000 Tests onto galaxy: - Currently ttnn.all_gather(..) in a ring relies on MeshDevice being initialized in ring-order. Now we decouple this so we don't require that MeshDevice is initialized with devices in a ring-order. Instead, we now explicitly request for a ring-order in the operation that requires it.
5 tasks
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2024
1. Submeshing to support creating submesh on galaxy mesh 2. Key change to start enabling more T3000 Tests onto galaxy: - Currently ttnn.all_gather(..) in a ring relies on MeshDevice being initialized in ring-order. Now we decouple this so we don't require that MeshDevice is initialized with devices in a ring-order. Instead, we now explicitly request for a ring-order in the operation that requires it.
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2024
1. Submeshing to support creating submesh on galaxy mesh 2. Key change to start enabling more T3000 Tests onto galaxy: - Currently ttnn.all_gather(..) in a ring relies on MeshDevice being initialized in ring-order. Now we decouple this so we don't require that MeshDevice is initialized with devices in a ring-order. Instead, we now explicitly request for a ring-order in the operation that requires it.
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2024
1. Submeshing to support creating submesh on galaxy mesh 2. Key change to start enabling more T3000 Tests onto galaxy: - Currently ttnn.all_gather(..) in a ring relies on MeshDevice being initialized in ring-order. Now we decouple this so we don't require that MeshDevice is initialized with devices in a ring-order. Instead, we now explicitly request for a ring-order in the operation that requires it.
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2024
1. Submeshing to support creating submesh on galaxy mesh 2. Key change to start enabling more T3000 Tests onto galaxy: - Currently ttnn.all_gather(..) in a ring relies on MeshDevice being initialized in ring-order. Now we decouple this so we don't require that MeshDevice is initialized with devices in a ring-order. Instead, we now explicitly request for a ring-order in the operation that requires it.
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2024
1. Submeshing to support creating submesh on galaxy mesh 2. Key change to start enabling more T3000 Tests onto galaxy: - Currently ttnn.all_gather(..) in a ring relies on MeshDevice being initialized in ring-order. Now we decouple this so we don't require that MeshDevice is initialized with devices in a ring-order. Instead, we now explicitly request for a ring-order in the operation that requires it.
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2024
1. Submeshing to support creating submesh on galaxy mesh 2. Key change to start enabling more T3000 Tests onto galaxy: - Currently ttnn.all_gather(..) in a ring relies on MeshDevice being initialized in ring-order. Now we decouple this so we don't require that MeshDevice is initialized with devices in a ring-order. Instead, we now explicitly request for a ring-order in the operation that requires it.
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2024
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2024
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2024
cfjchu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Construct a 2x4 DeviceMesh on galaxy with RING configuration and leverage existing T3000 test suite for galaxy testing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: