Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#7560: Re-enable Stable Diffusion tests in CI #11153

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

esmalTT
Copy link
Contributor

@esmalTT esmalTT commented Aug 7, 2024

Ticket

#7560

Summary

It seems like we can re-enable the SD tests with SLOW_MATMULS enabled, as I have not seen any hangs or failures after 3 pipeline runs in this configuration.

Once merged, I will monitor the pipeline for failures.

Checklist

  • Post commit CI passes
  • Blackhole Post commit (if applicable)
  • Model regression CI testing passes (if applicable)
  • New/Existing tests provide coverage for changes

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ fail=0

echo "Running unstable nightly tests for WH B0 only"

SLOW_MATMULS=1 WH_ARCH_YAML=wormhole_b0_80_arch_eth_dispatch.yaml env pytest -n auto tests/ttnn/integration_tests/stable_diffusion ; fail+=$?
env SLOW_MATMULS=1 WH_ARCH_YAML=wormhole_b0_80_arch_eth_dispatch.yaml pytest -n auto tests/ttnn/integration_tests/stable_diffusion ; fail+=$?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DAMN!!!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

F

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

...

@tt-rkim
Copy link
Collaborator

tt-rkim commented Aug 8, 2024

how's a run of this looking like for nightly FD?

@esmalTT
Copy link
Contributor Author

esmalTT commented Aug 8, 2024

@tt-rkim
Copy link
Collaborator

tt-rkim commented Aug 8, 2024

RUN ITTTTT

Do we need to update SD codeowners?

@esmalTT esmalTT force-pushed the esmal/enable-sd-tests branch 2 times, most recently from ee36d9c to 0978a39 Compare August 8, 2024 14:38
@esmalTT
Copy link
Contributor Author

esmalTT commented Aug 8, 2024

RUN ITTTTT

Do we need to update SD codeowners?

@tt-rkim Good call. I updated it here in a separate commit. Added @mywoodstock as an owner as well since I think he's the most familiar with SD at the moment - let me know if you think someone else is better suited.

@esmalTT esmalTT force-pushed the esmal/enable-sd-tests branch from 0978a39 to 6797bf1 Compare August 8, 2024 15:20
@esmalTT esmalTT merged commit 7b6079c into main Aug 8, 2024
5 checks passed
@esmalTT esmalTT deleted the esmal/enable-sd-tests branch August 8, 2024 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants