[beta-private-cluster-update-variant] Enable image streaming at cluster level

[jawnsy]

TL;DR

The documentation describes the enable_gcfs flag for node pools, but this does not seem to enable the cluster-level image streaming option

Terraform Resources

No response

Detailed design

No response

Additional information

We are defining our node pools like this, according to the documentation, with the enable_gcfs = true flag:

    {
      name               = "pool"
      preemptible        = false
      spot               = true
      enable_secure_boot = true
      enable_gcfs        = true
      machine_type       = "t2d-standard-4"
      min_count          = 0
      max_count          = 10
      max_surge          = 4
      image_type         = "COS_CONTAINERD"
    },

However, after the cluster is created, the Image Streaming option is not enabled in the UI:

[bharathkkb]

Thanks for the report! Does enable_gcfs show up in the plan at all? I am wondering if this is a bug in the module or the provider.

[lauraseidler]

We're having the same "issue" - but I don't think it's a bug.

Image streaming can be enabled on clusters and/or on node pools, with the cluster setting being inherited to its node pools, unless the setting is overridden on node pool level.

AFAICS, this module so far only supports enabling image streaming on node pool level, so it would make sense to me that image streaming on cluster level is shown as disabled. I would expect that if the option is added to also enable it on cluster level, this would show also in the UI. I don't see image streaming in the UI for node pools, but it shows up correctly as enabled when getting it via gcloud container node-pools describe [...].

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days

[themanifold]

This shouldn't be closed, it's not fixed yet.

[snigdhasambitak]

Yes, image streaming on the cluster level is a necessary feature. So, if possible this could be an enhancement to the module

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days

[jawnsy]

I believe this is still an open issue

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days

[jawnsy]

I believe this is still an open issue

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days

[jawnsy]

I think this issue is still valid, not stale.

Thanks to @lauraseidler for opening #1696!