Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temporarily ignore DB2 test - unrelated CI disk space issues #2557

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 12, 2020

Conversation

kiview
Copy link
Member

@kiview kiview commented Apr 12, 2020

We have some problems with file space running out on CI, so the jdbc-test module, pulling a lot of database images, can potentially break the build.

We have some problems with file space running out on CI, so the jdbc-test module, pulling a lot of database images, can potentially break the build.
@rnorth
Copy link
Member

rnorth commented Apr 12, 2020

Doesn't SimpleDb2Test need to be @Ignored as well? The cause of the failure could happen with either test, I think.

@kiview
Copy link
Member Author

kiview commented Apr 12, 2020

Whoops, missed those.

@rnorth rnorth changed the title Temporary ignore DB2 test in JDBCDriverTest Temporarily ignore DB2 test in JDBCDriverTest Apr 12, 2020
@rnorth rnorth changed the title Temporarily ignore DB2 test in JDBCDriverTest Temporarily ignore DB2 test - unrelated CI disk space issues Apr 12, 2020
@rnorth rnorth merged commit c90a9f9 into master Apr 12, 2020
@rnorth rnorth deleted the ignore-db2-test branch April 12, 2020 13:18
@bsideup bsideup added this to the next milestone Apr 12, 2020
quincy pushed a commit to quincy/testcontainers-java that referenced this pull request May 28, 2020
…tainers#2557)

* Temporary ignore DB2 test in JDBCDriverTest.data

We have some problems with file space running out on CI, so the jdbc-test module, pulling a lot of database images, can potentially break the build.

* Also ignore SimpleDb2Test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants