feat: add "pro" variant for LocalStack image

[the-wondersmith]

PR adds a "pro" variant of the existing LocalStack image.

[DDtKey]

Looks good to me, a few comments to discuss only

Thank you! 🙏

[DDtKey]

Looks good to me

[the-wondersmith]

@DDtKey Some of the CI is failing, but it doesn't seem like it's the new code?

• MSRV failed on default (somehow) and cncf_distribution

error: package `home v0.5.11` cannot be built because it requires rustc 1.81 or newer, while the currently active rustc version is 1.75.0

• stable and nightly both failed on oracle

Error: DpiError(DbError { code: 0, offset: 0, message: "DPI-1047: Cannot locate a 64-bit Oracle Client library: \"libaio.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory\". See https://oracle.github.io/odpi/doc/installation.html#linux for help", fn_name: "dpiContext_createWithParams", action: "load library", is_recoverable: false, is_warning: false })

Reasonably certain I could fix the CI for both of those, but I don't think it should be a part of this PR. Want me to take a crack at it as a separate PR? 🤔

[DDtKey]

Yes, I guess MSRV was bumped as part of path/minor version of the dependency.

We can either stick it to particular version, or consider MSRV update, but as a breaking change.

Using specific version of dependency may be a pain for our users, if they already updated it
I think we can consider update of MSRV in separate PR

[the-wondersmith]

Yes, I guess MSRV was bumped as part of path/minor version of the dependency.

We can either stick it to particular version, or consider MSRV update, but as a breaking change.

Using specific version of dependency may be a pain for our users, if they already updated it I think we can consider update of MSRV in separate PR

What's that mean for this PR? Does it need to wait until CI can be fixed?

[DDtKey]

Not really, it's merged

But we need fixes for the next release