Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preparing for types being provided via DefinitelyTyped #183

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2020
Merged

Preparing for types being provided via DefinitelyTyped #183

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2020

Conversation

gnapse
Copy link
Member

@gnapse gnapse commented Jan 16, 2020

What:

#175 and #182

Why:

#123 and DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped#37792

Checklist:

  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • Updated Type Definitions
  • Ready to be merged

gnapse and others added 2 commits December 18, 2019 09:28
BREAKING CHANGE: moving typings to @types/testing-library__jest-dom
@gnapse gnapse mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2020
4 tasks
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #183 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #183   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          19     19           
  Lines         234    234           
  Branches       57     57           
=====================================
  Hits          234    234
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/extend-expect.js 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8e14dc1...d68ccd7. Read the comment docs.

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@jgoz jgoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me aside from the Readme issue

@jgoz jgoz merged commit 760409a into master Jan 17, 2020
@jgoz jgoz deleted the next branch January 17, 2020 00:00
@gnapse
Copy link
Member Author

gnapse commented Jan 17, 2020

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants