Update outdated LICENSE year #1133
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit ba3f62a:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1133 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 181 181
Branches 36 36
=========================================
Hits 181 181
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
Whoops, forgot to call that out as a docs change in the commit message. Oh well 😅 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With this update, you won't care about any further license year updates
Using present instead of the second year is a common pattern, here are some examples
https://github.com/babel/babel/blob/4fb29a372b18e82ba72262db43b80b220a5cce01/LICENSE#L3 https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/blob/8ad084251a5b3e4617157fc52795b6284e68bc1e/LICENSE.md?plain=1#L3 https://github.com/pmndrs/react-spring/blob/e7d423cde197db9d53a00f96422c6d7f8ce12b29/LICENSE#L3 https://github.com/vercel/styled-jsx/blob/e8245813f9c3e633a9b2d2414fb11e6386b31216/license.md?plain=1#L3 https://github.com/styled-components/styled-components/blob/09929bd9bc05da085206c94679f07597b46212e4/LICENSE#L3