Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ignore tables starting with -tx- #133

Closed
tgrosinger opened this issue Dec 3, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #185
Closed

Ignore tables starting with -tx- #133

tgrosinger opened this issue Dec 3, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #185
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tgrosinger
Copy link
Owner

The Tables Extended plugin adds support for MultiMarkdown in Obsidian. Because of how cells can be merged in that format, Advanced Tables improperly formats them.

Until #59 can be completed, we should at least ignore tables which have a -tx- immediately preceeding the first line.
@tgrosinger tgrosinger added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 3, 2021
@tgrosinger
Copy link
Owner Author

tgrosinger commented Dec 3, 2021 •
edited
Loading

See also: #119 and aidenlx/table-extended#21

@aidenlx
Copy link

aidenlx commented Dec 4, 2021

btw, tx code blocks should be also ignored. It's not completely deprecated since the upcoming live preview update may need code blocks to render things in editor

@tgrosinger tgrosinger mentioned this issue Dec 24, 2021
Closed
@tgrosinger
Copy link
Owner Author

Finally got this fixed. Sorry it took so long!

@calosliu calosliu mentioned this issue Mar 24, 2022
Merged
tgrosinger pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2022
@calosliu @tgrosinger
Fix preceedingLineNum index
962eb1d 
Fixes #133
Fixes #130
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix preceedingLineNum index
2 participants
@tgrosinger @aidenlx