Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure project as Cargo workspace and drop direct dependency on a HTTP server, and also CF Worker (wasm) runtime #127

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2023

Conversation

dotansimha
Copy link
Member

@dotansimha dotansimha commented Nov 14, 2023

Closes #131 #39 #98

  • Setup Cargo workspace
  • Split benches into a crate
  • Move core impl into a crate (engine)
  • Create new bin entry point (conductor crate)
  • Split config into a crate
  • Improve specific types and structs and make it more common and easier to consume (specifically Request/Response/Body)
  • Remove dependency for HTTP/runtime from the core package
  • Switch entry point to use actix-web
  • Rust 1.74 for CI
  • Fix CI
  • Added CF Worker runtime

@dotansimha dotansimha changed the title restructure project as Cargo workspace Restructure project as Cargo workspace Nov 14, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2023

🐋 This PR was built and pushed to the following Docker images:

Docker Bake metadata
{
"conductor": {
  "containerimage.config.digest": "sha256:89060319fcf765939468f865fb03d91c5117a9b8437ce093e8a77797091ca0a5",
  "containerimage.descriptor": {
    "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
    "digest": "sha256:9f1423b1835a2b37efe46358d0bcb7cd3c6223aa2444f5bbfd67a33470a5f270",
    "size": 901,
    "platform": {
      "architecture": "amd64",
      "os": "linux"
    }
  },
  "containerimage.digest": "sha256:9f1423b1835a2b37efe46358d0bcb7cd3c6223aa2444f5bbfd67a33470a5f270",
  "image.name": "ghcr.io/the-guild-org/conductor-t2/conductor:bf6ece8f9a84928ae4198b4b1118008aff1153c6"
}
}

@dotansimha dotansimha changed the title Restructure project as Cargo workspace Restructure project as Cargo workspace and drop direct dependency on a HTTP server Nov 16, 2023
@dotansimha dotansimha marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2023 16:34
ok separated config now

wip

wip

wip

ok ok

ok it's working again

ok getting there

ok

bring back plugins

fix graphiql

fix graphiql again

fix tracing

ok ok ok

fix clippy, fmt, over-http and ci

fix benches
fix deps

fix docker image

fix
@dotansimha dotansimha changed the title Restructure project as Cargo workspace and drop direct dependency on a HTTP server Restructure project as Cargo workspace and drop direct dependency on a HTTP server, and also CF Worker (wasm) runtime Nov 18, 2023
&mut |route_data, app, path| {
let child_router = Scope::new(path.as_str())
.app_data(web::Data::new(route_data))
.route("/.*", web::route().to(handler));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when I tried running locally, I got a few of this warning:

2023-11-19T01:32:35.930689Z  WARN actix_router::resource: Tail segments must have names. Consider `.../{tail}*`. This may become a panic in the future.
2023-11-19T01:32:35.930853Z  WARN actix_router::resource: Tail segments must have names. Consider `.../{tail}*`. This may become a panic in the future.
2023-11-19T01:32:35.930998Z  WARN actix_router::resource: Tail segments must have names. Consider `.../{tail}*`. This may become a panic in the future.

In Actix-web, when defining a route that captures all the remaining path segments, we should give a name to these segments, which are referred in the error as the "tail" segment. The warning suggests that we're currently using a route that captures all the remaining segments but we don't name them.

Also, the warning mentions that this might become a panic in future versions of Actix-web.

btw, Actix-web lets us catch the trailing segments and access it in the handler like this:

async fn handler(
    req: HttpRequest,
    body: Bytes,
    route_data: web::Data<ConductorGatewayRouteData>,
    gw: web::Data<ConductorGateway>,
    path: web::Path<(String,)>, // Optionally added to capture the tail segment, in case we ever need it
) -> impl Responder {
    // ....
    let tail_segment = &path.0;
Suggested change
.route("/.*", web::route().to(handler));
.route("/{tail:.*}", web::route().to(handler));

Copy link
Member

@YassinEldeeb YassinEldeeb Nov 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update: using named segments path breaks path matching, visiting: /graphql and /test doesn't work after the switch, maybe we should wait for a fix...I tried debugging it for some time, but I can't seem to get it to work without anonymous segments matching.

@@ -101,7 +138,7 @@ jobs:
command: build
target: ${{ matrix.platform.target }}
args: "--locked --release"
strip: true
strip: false
Copy link
Member

@YassinEldeeb YassinEldeeb Nov 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe strip default value is false

Suggested change
strip: false

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
use core::future::Future;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if async_runtime abstraction is needed in its own crate, it's very minimal.
and it's only to encounter cross platform runtime differences with wasm.

Also, it does handle reqwest client initiation, so the name async_runtime is kind of confusing.

But, also at the same time, I appreciate separating it, since this can grow much larger in the future as we progress, it also eases testing cross-platform compatibility, so how about the name wasm_polyfills instead?

and when it comes to usage, to be like this:

-let fetcher = create_http_client().build().unwrap();
+let fetcher = wasm_polyfills::create_http_client().build().unwrap();

So, we eliminate a few jumps to imports & implementation, when reading inline code usage.

[dependencies]
criterion = { version = "0.5.1", features = ["html_reports"] }
conductor = { path = "../conductor" }
futures = { workspace = true }
Copy link
Member

@YassinEldeeb YassinEldeeb Nov 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had no idea { workspace = true } was added to infer workspace root dependencies' versions
Last time I checked, it was an abandoned RFC 😄
rust-lang/rfcs#2906

This is really cool! Good to know!

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
[package]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we can separate the workspace instead of:

crates
├── async_runtime
├── benches
├── cloudflare_worker
├── common
├── conductor
├── config
└── engine

to:

bins
├── conductor
└── cloudflare_worker
libs
├── async_runtime
├── benches
├── common
├── config
└── engine

So, that there is separation between what is executable and what is code specific like libraries. what do you think? 👀

let conductor_config_str = env.var("CONDUCTOR_CONFIG").map(|v| v.to_string());

match conductor_config_str {
Ok(conductor_config_str) => match from_yaml(&conductor_config_str) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like from_yaml isn't clear when interpreted inline at the first glance,
how about we rename it to parse_config_from_yaml(..)?

Comment on lines +163 to +165
pub fn from_yaml(contents: &str) -> Result<ConductorConfig, serde_yaml::Error> {
serde_yaml::from_str::<ConductorConfig>(contents)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since we added this utility, we can also use it above, and extract one for json too like this:

pub fn parse_config_from_yaml(contents: &str) -> Result<ConductorConfig, serde_yaml::Error> {
    serde_yaml::from_str::<ConductorConfig>(contents)
}

pub fn parse_config_from_json(contents: &str) -> Result<ConductorConfig, serde_json::Error> {
    serde_json::from_str::<ConductorConfig>(contents)
}

and above, we use those utilities too:

match path.extension() {
    Some(ext) => match ext.to_str() {
        Some("json") => parse_config_from_json(&contents).expect("Failed to parse config file"),
        Some("yaml") | Some("yml") => {
            parse_config_from_yaml(&contents).expect("Failed to parse config file")
        }
    }
}  

actix-web = "4.4.0"
tracing = { workspace = true }
tracing-subscriber = "0.3.18"
openssl = { version = "0.10", features = ["vendored"] }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder where are we using this? 🤔

#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
#[actix_web::main]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

YESSS! Can't wait to see how that impacts the bench numbers

Copy link
Member

@YassinEldeeb YassinEldeeb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is Incredible!
It's super clean 💯

@YassinEldeeb
Copy link
Member

YassinEldeeb commented Nov 19, 2023

Since, the feedback is opinionated, and nothing is really crucial.
I've applied the feedback here #136, so you can checkout to the branch, try it,
and get a feel for it, and decide if you like to merge it or not.

We can merge this now!

@YassinEldeeb YassinEldeeb merged commit 93612a3 into master Nov 19, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cargo Workspace
2 participants