Fix typecheck: TextIOBase instead of TextIO

[tovrstra]

This fixes one aspect of #367, includes test.

As far as I understand, type hints should still use TextIO from the typing module, so I'm not changing these.

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request fixes a type checking issue by replacing TextIO with TextIOBase in the _interpret_file_lineno function and adds a new test to verify the handling of mixed pure Cartesian data.

• Bug Fixes:
  • Fixed type checking by replacing TextIO with TextIOBase in the _interpret_file_lineno function.
• Tests:
  • Added a new test test_mixed_pure_cartesian to verify the handling of mixed pure Cartesian data in the molden_dump_one function.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 22475e1..d3fbc2b. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Shell	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request addresses a type checking issue by replacing TextIO with TextIOBase in the iodata/utils.py file. Additionally, a new test function test_mixed_pure_cartesian has been added to iodata/test/test_molden.py to validate the handling of mixed pure Cartesian data.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
iodata/test/test_molden.py iodata/utils.py	Added a new test case in test_molden.py and fixed type checking by replacing TextIO with TextIOBase in utils.py.

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @tovrstra - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 4 issues found
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[PaulWAyers]

LGTM

[tovrstra]

Thanks for checking, Paul!