Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not the recommended way to provide custom assets #2674

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

pablobm
Copy link
Collaborator

@pablobm pablobm commented Oct 4, 2024

As discussed at #2475, these generators no longer represent the recommended way to provide custom assets. Therefore they are deprecated and can be removed.

@pablobm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pablobm commented Oct 4, 2024

@elias19r - Does this look correct to you? (If you can remember 😄)

@pablobm pablobm mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@elias19r elias19r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi! Trying to remember. But reading comments from the linked PR, I agree with our past selves :D

I lean toward removing those generators and making users customize assets by appending to Administrate's CSS/JS, just like the example in this PR, instead of completely replacing them with their own.

@nickcharlton nickcharlton merged commit b7aa546 into thoughtbot:main Oct 8, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants