Introduction to the COSEAQ Framework

COSEAQ Framework Introduction

The COSEAQ framework is a comprehensive scaffolding system designed to enhance educational workflows through generative AI integration. It focuses on improving the development of high-quality educational content—including essay questions, assessment guidelines, and quizzes—by facilitating meaningful dialogue between educators and AI while incorporating theoretical principles such as constructive alignment and assessment literacy.

Rather than being merely a tool, COSEAQ provides a structured approach that ensures alignment between teaching practices, syllabi, and national curriculum requirements. Its fundamental purpose is to create cohesion among all course elements to optimize student learning outcomes.

At the framework's core are microprompts—carefully crafted instructions that scaffold the workflow and guide teacher-AI interactions. These microprompts can be implemented in various AI platforms such as Claude or ChatGPT. In Claude, educators can create a project and upload relevant files, then apply specific microprompts from the framework. Alternatively, they can access Custom GPTs (Generative Pre-trained Transformers) through OpenAI's ChatGPT by searching for COSEAQ. While each component functions independently, the framework is designed for integrated implementation to maximize effectiveness.

Educators can employ the microprompts either sequentially or as standalone tools, depending on their specific needs and preferences. This flexible, modular approach enables teachers to select the most appropriate components for their subject matter and teaching context. Importantly, the framework serves as scaffolding rather than an automated solution, preserving teacher autonomy and educational integrity throughout the content creation process.

The framework's integration of generative AI aims to enhance pedagogical processes while maintaining the educator's essential role. By incorporating various theoretical frameworks, COSEAQ allows teachers to select approaches that best align with their teaching philosophy and subject requirements.

Furthermore, the framework's microprompts can be effectively utilized across different language models, including Claude 3 and Gemini Advanced. All microprompt sets are openly available on GitHub, ensuring broad accessibility and adaptability for educators.

Through its structured approach and systematic implementation, COSEAQ empowers educators to create superior content while developing their professional expertise. As AI continues to evolve in educational contexts, the framework stands as a valuable resource for teachers seeking to integrate generative AI effectively into their pedagogical practice.

Core Aspects of the Framework

• Dialogic Approach: Facilitates meaningful exchanges between educators and AI through structured microprompts, enabling collaborative and iterative content creation that combines human expertise with AI capabilities.

• Scaffolding Support: Provides carefully designed microprompts that structure and guide content generation, ensuring alignment with educational standards while fostering critical thinking and deeper understanding.

• Customized GPTs: Offers standalone yet combinable GPTs that address various educational needs, providing both versatility and adaptability in application.

Purpose Beyond Efficiency

The COSEAQ framework's primary objective is to enhance educators' professional expertise and practice, with improved efficiency as a secondary benefit. Through generative AI integration, it enriches pedagogical processes in multiple ways:

• The dialogic approach encourages critical examination of content and learning objectives
• Scaffolding support ensures alignment with educational standards
• The framework promotes deeper understanding and pedagogical improvement

Crucially, COSEAQ prioritizes teacher autonomy and educational integrity. Educators maintain control over the content creation process, exercising their professional judgment in guiding the AI and making final decisions about generated materials. The framework's flexibility accommodates various theoretical approaches, including constructive alignment and assessment literacy, allowing teachers to adapt it to their specific teaching practices and subject matter requirements.

Ultimately, COSEAQ ensures that technology serves educational needs rather than dictating them. By providing a structured framework for educator-AI collaboration, it empowers teachers to create high-quality educational materials efficiently while preserving their pedagogical expertise and professional autonomy.

#AIED #GenAI #EducationalTechnology #TeachingInnovation

COSEAQ Framework: Integrated Educational Content Development Workflow

1. Establishing the Educational Foundation

The COSEAQ framework begins with two foundational components that establish a robust pedagogical base through coordinated implementation:

Primary Foundation Components:

COSEAQ O (Objective Formulation and Syllabus Interpretation)

This component bridges broad educational goals with specific, actionable objectives by:

• Structuring the systematic interpretation of syllabi and national curricula
• Establishing measurable learning outcomes
• Implementing SMART objectives (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)
• Defining achievable educational goals
• Creating the framework for content development and assessment

COSEAQ C (Content Generation from Curriculum)

Operating in alignment with Objective Formulation, this component transforms curriculum requirements into structured educational content by:

• Converting curriculum guidelines into comprehensive teaching materials
• Developing content aligned with learning objectives
• Maintaining educational standards throughout development
• Supporting multiple assessment methods through content design
• Connecting objectives directly to teaching materials

2. Study Question Development: The Core Process

COSEAQ S (Study Question Developer) builds upon components O and C to bridge basic content with advanced assessment methods.

COSEAQ S Implementation Process:

Implements dialogic scaffolding through three distinct phases:

1. Dialogic Development

   • Facilitates teacher-AI dialogue
   • Refines questions through iterative feedback
   • Maintains learning objective alignment
   • Confirms educational relevance

2. Question Diversity Enhancement

   • Implements diverse question formats
   • Develops varied concept testing approaches
   • Ensures subject matter coverage
   • Establishes comprehensive question resources

3. Learning Style Integration Develops three question categories:

   • Scenario-Based: Real-world application focus
   • Open-Ended: Advanced thinking development
   • Critical Analysis: Evaluative skill enhancement

3. Advanced Assessment Implementation

The framework diverges into two assessment pathways, each building on study question foundations:

Path A: Quiz Development Cycle

1. COSEAQ Q (Quiz Generation)

   • Adapts study questions to quiz formats
   • Implements analytical depth
   • Develops structured answer options
   • Maintains objective alignment
   • Integrates difficulty gradients

2. COSEAQ M (Misconception Analysis)

   • Analyzes conceptual misconceptions
   • Develops effective distractors
   • Optimizes educational value
   • Enhances learning outcomes
   • Validates effectiveness

3. Enhancement Cycle

   • Implements Q-M component iteration
   • Refines questions systematically
   • Integrates improvements
   • Maintains objective alignment
   • Ensures pedagogical value

4. COSEAQ QE (Quality Evaluation - Beta)

   • Conducts quality assessment
   • Evaluates balance and effectiveness
   • Validates educational alignment
   • Confirms assessment validity
   • Provides enhancement recommendations

Path B: Essay Development Process

1. COSEAQ E (Essay Assessment Design)

   • Transforms questions into essay format
   • Establishes assessment guidelines
   • Develops grading criteria
   • Implements scoring systems
   • Provides response examples
   • Sets clear expectations

2. COSEAQ A (Assessment Implementation)

   • Guides assessment execution
   • Ensures objective alignment
   • Integrates assessment types
   • Implements analytical approaches
   • Maintains assessment quality

Implementation Strategies

Strategic Benefits

1. Development Structure

   • Ensures methodical progression
   • Preserves educational integrity
   • Supports comprehensive assessment
   • Implements quality control
   • Enables consistent evaluation

2. Quality Management

   • Implements review stages
   • Establishes evaluation protocols
   • Maintains alignment checks
   • Validates pedagogical approaches
   • Integrates stakeholder input

3. Flexible Implementation

   • Enables pathway customization
   • Supports parallel development
   • Adapts to specific requirements
   • Scales assessment processes
   • Optimizes resource utilization

Operational Guidelines

Quiz Development

1. Establish foundational questions
2. Implement Q→M→Q refinement
3. Apply QE validation
4. Maintain objective alignment
5. Document processes systematically

Essay Assessment

1. Build on validated questions
2. Develop assessment criteria
3. Implement evaluation protocols
4. Ensure objective alignment
5. Maintain process transparency

Implementation Framework

1. Documentation Protocol

   • Record progression details
   • Track refinement processes
   • Verify alignment
   • Maintain feedback records
   • Archive development data

2. Quality Assurance

   • Review alignment regularly
   • Integrate feedback continuously
   • Validate systematically
   • Monitor performance
   • Document improvements

3. System Coordination

   • Enable smooth transitions
   • Maintain consistent standards
   • Implement coherent approaches
   • Establish clear protocols
   • Optimize resource use

This workflow emphasizes study questions as the foundation for assessment development while implementing systematic refinement processes and structured assessment approaches.