raft: port disruptive test

src/raft.rs

@@ -952,7 +952,16 @@ impl<T: Storage> Raft<T> {
                 // two features is to minimize the disruption caused by nodes that have been
                 // removed from the cluster's configuration: a removed node will send MsgVotes
                 // which will be ignored, but it will not receive MsgApp or MsgHeartbeat, so it
-                // will not create disruptive term increases
+                // will not create disruptive term increases, by notifying leader of this node's
+                // activeness.
+                // The above comments also true for Pre-Vote
+                //
+                // When follower gets isolated, it soon starts an election ending
+                // up with a higher term than leader, although it won't receive enough
+                // votes to win the election. When it regains connectivity, this response
+                // with "pb.MsgAppResp" of higher term would force leader to step down.
+                // However, this disruption is inevitable to free this stuck node with
+                // fresh election. This can be prevented with Pre-Vote phase.
                 let to_send = new_message(m.get_from(), MessageType::MsgAppendResponse, None);
                 self.send(to_send);
             } else {

tests/cases/test_raft.rs

@@ -2260,6 +2260,151 @@ fn test_non_promotable_voter_which_check_quorum() {
     assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].leader_id, 1);
 }
 
+/// `test_disruptive_follower` tests isolated follower,
+/// with slow network incoming from leader, election times out
+/// to become a candidate with an increased term. Then, the
+/// candiate's response to late leader heartbeat forces the leader
+/// to step down.
+#[test]
+fn test_disruptive_follower() {
+    let mut n1 = new_test_raft(1, vec![1, 2, 3], 10, 1, new_storage());
+    let mut n2 = new_test_raft(2, vec![1, 2, 3], 10, 1, new_storage());
+    let mut n3 = new_test_raft(3, vec![1, 2, 3], 10, 1, new_storage());
+
+    n1.check_quorum = true;
+    n2.check_quorum = true;
+    n3.check_quorum = true;
+
+    n1.become_follower(1, INVALID_ID);
+    n2.become_follower(1, INVALID_ID);
+    n3.become_follower(1, INVALID_ID);
+
+    let mut nt = Network::new(vec![Some(n1), Some(n2), Some(n3)]);
+    nt.send(vec![new_message(1, 1, MessageType::MsgHup, 0)]);
+
+    // check state
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].state, StateRole::Leader);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].state, StateRole::Follower);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].state, StateRole::Follower);
+
+    // etcd server "advanceTicksForElection" on restart;
+    // this is to expedite campaign trigger when given larger
+    // election timeouts (e.g. multi-datacenter deploy)
+    // Or leader messages are being delayed while ticks elapse
+    let timeout = nt.peers[&3].get_election_timeout();
+    nt.peers
+        .get_mut(&3)
+        .unwrap()
+        .set_randomized_election_timeout(timeout + 2);
+    let timeout = nt.peers[&3].get_randomized_election_timeout();
+    for _ in 0..timeout - 1 {
+        nt.peers.get_mut(&3).unwrap().tick();
+    }
+
+    // ideally, before last election tick elapses,
+    // the follower n3 receives "pb.MsgApp" or "pb.MsgHeartbeat"
+    // from leader n1, and then resets its "electionElapsed"
+    // however, last tick may elapse before receiving any
+    // messages from leader, thus triggering campaign
+    nt.peers.get_mut(&3).unwrap().tick();
+
+    // n1 is still leader yet
+    // while its heartbeat to candidate n3 is being delayed
+    // check state
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].state, StateRole::Leader);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].state, StateRole::Follower);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].state, StateRole::Candidate);
+
+    // check term
+    // n1.Term == 2
+    // n2.Term == 2
+    // n3.Term == 3
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].term, 2);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].term, 2);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].term, 3);
+
+    // while outgoing vote requests are still queued in n3,
+    // leader heartbeat finally arrives at candidate n3
+    // however, due to delayed network from leader, leader
+    // heartbeat was sent with lower term than candidate's
+    let mut msg = new_message(1, 3, MessageType::MsgHeartbeat, 0);
+    msg.set_term(nt.peers[&1].term);
+    nt.send(vec![msg]);
+
+    // then candidate n3 responds with "pb.MsgAppResp" of higher term
+    // and leader steps down from a message with higher term
+    // this is to disrupt the current leader, so that candidate
+    // with higher term can be freed with following election
+
+    // check state
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].state, StateRole::Follower);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].state, StateRole::Follower);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].state, StateRole::Candidate);
+
+    // check term
+    // n1.Term == 3
+    // n2.Term == 2
+    // n3.Term == 3
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].term, 3);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].term, 2);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].term, 3);
+}
+
+/// `test_disruptive_follower_pre_vote` tests isolated follower,
+/// with slow network incoming from leader, election times out
+/// to become a pre-candidate with less log than current leader.
+/// Then pre-vote phase prevents this isolated node from forcing
+/// current leader to step down, thus less disruptions.
+#[test]
+fn test_disruptive_follower_pre_vote() {
+    let mut n1 = new_test_raft_with_prevote(1, vec![1, 2, 3], 10, 1, new_storage(), true);
+    let mut n2 = new_test_raft_with_prevote(2, vec![1, 2, 3], 10, 1, new_storage(), true);
+    let mut n3 = new_test_raft_with_prevote(3, vec![1, 2, 3], 10, 1, new_storage(), true);
+
+    n1.check_quorum = true;
+    n2.check_quorum = true;
+    n3.check_quorum = true;
+
+    n1.become_follower(1, INVALID_ID);
+    n2.become_follower(1, INVALID_ID);
+    n3.become_follower(1, INVALID_ID);
+
+    let mut nt = Network::new(vec![Some(n1), Some(n2), Some(n3)]);
+    nt.send(vec![new_message(1, 1, MessageType::MsgHup, 0)]);
+
+    // check state
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].state, StateRole::Leader);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].state, StateRole::Follower);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].state, StateRole::Follower);
+
+    nt.isolate(3);
+    nt.send(vec![new_message(1, 1, MessageType::MsgPropose, 1)]);
+    nt.send(vec![new_message(1, 1, MessageType::MsgPropose, 1)]);
+    nt.send(vec![new_message(1, 1, MessageType::MsgPropose, 1)]);
+
+    nt.recover();
+    nt.send(vec![new_message(3, 3, MessageType::MsgHup, 0)]);
+
+    // check state
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].state, StateRole::Leader);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].state, StateRole::Follower);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].state, StateRole::PreCandidate);
+
+    // check term
+    // n1.Term == 2
+    // n2.Term == 2
+    // n3.Term == 2
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].term, 2);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&2].term, 2);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&3].term, 2);
+
+    // delayed leader heartbeat does not force current leader to step down
+    let mut msg = new_message(1, 3, MessageType::MsgHeartbeat, 0);
+    msg.set_term(nt.peers[&1].term);
+    nt.send(vec![msg]);
+    assert_eq!(nt.peers[&1].state, StateRole::Leader);
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn test_read_only_option_safe() {
     let a = new_test_raft(1, vec![1, 2, 3], 10, 1, new_storage());