chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-jest to v27.6.3

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
eslint-plugin-jest	27.6.2 -> 27.6.3

---

Release Notes

jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest (eslint-plugin-jest)

v27.6.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• replace use of deprecated methods (#​1453) (9204a51)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for ddc56ff1	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (ddc56ff)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (a1e193c)	207	205	99.03%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#1044)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation}

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩