-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zerocopy
dependency has a license incompatible with the crate itself
#176
Comments
@tkaitchuck I should be able to re-license; we've been considering doing this anyway. If I were to re-license and publish, would you be able to use the new release? |
Yes. To clarify, what sort of timeline are you looking at? |
I should be able to do it today; would that work for you? |
Yes, that's great |
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
Does this look like it'll work for you? google/zerocopy#542 |
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.14. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
Published 0.7.14 with these changes. Lmk if this fixes the problem. |
Thanks all! |
This was found by
cargo-deny
in amethyst/specs#770.zerocopy
has the license stringBSD-2-Clause
, butahash
hasMIT OR Apache-2.0
. The former is incompatible with the latter.Although this isn't in itself a fundamental problem, it does mean that the de-facto license that users of
ahash
are operating under isBSD-2-Clause
, which is less permissive and not suitable for some purposes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: