Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sync::watch
: Use Acquire/Release memory ordering instead of SeqCst #6018sync::watch
: Use Acquire/Release memory ordering instead of SeqCst #6018Changes from 2 commits
9f1723b
e5daae7
fb38b90
8dcfb56
ccbe55c
64f1e23
c0b73f0
2f3830d
ee45f07
6339961
28a0269
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That said, it would arguably make sense to use something stronger than relaxed for
ref_count_rx
. Currently this assert could fail:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both the sender and all receivers could be dropped independently in any order by different threads. I can't imagine how to link the sender-side closed state (refcount) with the receiver-side closed state (version bit) when using separate atomics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Either way, it's a separate question from what you're fixing here.