Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change README file #701

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

change README file #701

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eyadfareh
Copy link

No description provided.

@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @eyadfareh!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Where do I send my contribution?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

@eyadfareh eyadfareh closed this Jul 12, 2019
0lvin pushed a commit to free-z4u/roc-rk3328-cc that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2019
list_del() leaves the skb->next pointer poisoned, which can then lead to
 a crash in e.g. OVS forwarding.  For example, setting up an OVS VXLAN
 forwarding bridge on sfc as per:

========
$ ovs-vsctl show
5dfd9c47-f04b-4aaa-aa96-4fbb0a522a30
    Bridge "br0"
        Port "br0"
            Interface "br0"
                type: internal
        Port "enp6s0f0"
            Interface "enp6s0f0"
        Port "vxlan0"
            Interface "vxlan0"
                type: vxlan
                options: {key="1", local_ip="10.0.0.5", remote_ip="10.0.0.4"}
    ovs_version: "2.5.0"
========
(where 10.0.0.5 is an address on enp6s0f1)
and sending traffic across it will lead to the following panic:
========
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3-ehc+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R710/0M233H, BIOS 6.4.0 07/23/2013
RIP: 0010:dev_hard_start_xmit+0x38/0x200
Code: 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 20 48 85 ff 48 89 54 24 08 48 89 4c 24 18 0f 84 ab 01 00 00 48 8d 86 90 00 00 00 48 89 f5 48 89 44 24 10 <4c> 8b 33 48 c7 03 00 00 00 00 48 8b 05 c7 d1 b3 00 4d 85 f6 0f 95
RSP: 0018:ffff888627b437e0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: dead000000000100 RCX: ffff88862279c000
RDX: ffff888614a342c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff888618a88000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00000000000003e8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff888614a34140 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000062 R14: dead000000000100 R15: ffff888616430000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888627b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6d2bc6d000 CR3: 000000000200a000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 __dev_queue_xmit+0x623/0x870
 ? masked_flow_lookup+0xf7/0x220 [openvswitch]
 ? ep_poll_callback+0x101/0x310
 do_execute_actions+0xaba/0xaf0 [openvswitch]
 ? __wake_up_common+0x8a/0x150
 ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x87/0xc0
 ? queue_userspace_packet+0x31c/0x5b0 [openvswitch]
 ovs_execute_actions+0x47/0x120 [openvswitch]
 ovs_dp_process_packet+0x7d/0x110 [openvswitch]
 ovs_vport_receive+0x6e/0xd0 [openvswitch]
 ? dst_alloc+0x64/0x90
 ? rt_dst_alloc+0x50/0xd0
 ? ip_route_input_slow+0x19a/0x9a0
 ? __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb+0x198/0x1b0
 ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x856/0xa30
 ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x856/0xa30
 ? cpumask_next_and+0x19/0x20
 ? find_busiest_group+0x12d/0xcd0
 netdev_frame_hook+0xce/0x150 [openvswitch]
 __netif_receive_skb_core+0x205/0xae0
 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x11e/0x220
 netif_receive_skb_list+0x203/0x460
 ? __efx_rx_packet+0x335/0x5e0 [sfc]
 efx_poll+0x182/0x320 [sfc]
 net_rx_action+0x294/0x3c0
 __do_softirq+0xca/0x297
 irq_exit+0xa6/0xb0
 do_IRQ+0x54/0xd0
 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
 </IRQ>
========
So, in all listified-receive handling, instead pull skbs off the lists with
 skb_list_del_init().

Fixes: 9af86f9 ("net: core: fix use-after-free in __netif_receive_skb_list_core")
Fixes: 7da517a ("net: core: Another step of skb receive list processing")
Fixes: a4ca8b7 ("net: ipv4: fix drop handling in ip_list_rcv() and ip_list_rcv_finish()")
Fixes: d8269e2 ("net: ipv6: listify ipv6_rcv() and ip6_rcv_finish()")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch fwnode
parsing when adding all top level devices"):

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request May 21, 2020
Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
damentz pushed a commit to zen-kernel/zen-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2020
[ Upstream commit 25bdae0 ]

Mark the SCLK clock for Exynos5433 I2S1 device with IGNORE_UNUSED flag to
match its behaviour with SCLK clock for AUD_I2S (I2S0) device until
a proper fix for Exynos I2S driver is ready.

This fixes the following synchronous abort issue revealed by the probe
order change caused by the commit 93d2e43 ("of: platform: Batch
fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices")

Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
lr : samsung_i2s_probe+0x688/0x8f0
...
Call trace:
 samsung_i2s_probe+0x768/0x8f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
 really_probe+0x108/0x370
 driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
 bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
 __device_attach+0xdc/0x140
 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
 bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
 deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
 process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
 worker_thread+0x48/0x470
 kthread+0x134/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
Code: 17ffffaf d503201f f94086c0 91003000 (88dffc00)
---[ end trace ccf721c9400ddbd6 ]---

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ChiaweiW pushed a commit to AspeedTech-BMC/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2020
[ Upstream commit 22f6bbb ]

list_del() leaves the skb->next pointer poisoned, which can then lead to
 a crash in e.g. OVS forwarding.  For example, setting up an OVS VXLAN
 forwarding bridge on sfc as per:

========
$ ovs-vsctl show
5dfd9c47-f04b-4aaa-aa96-4fbb0a522a30
    Bridge "br0"
        Port "br0"
            Interface "br0"
                type: internal
        Port "enp6s0f0"
            Interface "enp6s0f0"
        Port "vxlan0"
            Interface "vxlan0"
                type: vxlan
                options: {key="1", local_ip="10.0.0.5", remote_ip="10.0.0.4"}
    ovs_version: "2.5.0"
========
(where 10.0.0.5 is an address on enp6s0f1)
and sending traffic across it will lead to the following panic:
========
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3-ehc+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R710/0M233H, BIOS 6.4.0 07/23/2013
RIP: 0010:dev_hard_start_xmit+0x38/0x200
Code: 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 20 48 85 ff 48 89 54 24 08 48 89 4c 24 18 0f 84 ab 01 00 00 48 8d 86 90 00 00 00 48 89 f5 48 89 44 24 10 <4c> 8b 33 48 c7 03 00 00 00 00 48 8b 05 c7 d1 b3 00 4d 85 f6 0f 95
RSP: 0018:ffff888627b437e0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: dead000000000100 RCX: ffff88862279c000
RDX: ffff888614a342c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff888618a88000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00000000000003e8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff888614a34140 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000062 R14: dead000000000100 R15: ffff888616430000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888627b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6d2bc6d000 CR3: 000000000200a000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 __dev_queue_xmit+0x623/0x870
 ? masked_flow_lookup+0xf7/0x220 [openvswitch]
 ? ep_poll_callback+0x101/0x310
 do_execute_actions+0xaba/0xaf0 [openvswitch]
 ? __wake_up_common+0x8a/0x150
 ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x87/0xc0
 ? queue_userspace_packet+0x31c/0x5b0 [openvswitch]
 ovs_execute_actions+0x47/0x120 [openvswitch]
 ovs_dp_process_packet+0x7d/0x110 [openvswitch]
 ovs_vport_receive+0x6e/0xd0 [openvswitch]
 ? dst_alloc+0x64/0x90
 ? rt_dst_alloc+0x50/0xd0
 ? ip_route_input_slow+0x19a/0x9a0
 ? __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb+0x198/0x1b0
 ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x856/0xa30
 ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x856/0xa30
 ? cpumask_next_and+0x19/0x20
 ? find_busiest_group+0x12d/0xcd0
 netdev_frame_hook+0xce/0x150 [openvswitch]
 __netif_receive_skb_core+0x205/0xae0
 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x11e/0x220
 netif_receive_skb_list+0x203/0x460
 ? __efx_rx_packet+0x335/0x5e0 [sfc]
 efx_poll+0x182/0x320 [sfc]
 net_rx_action+0x294/0x3c0
 __do_softirq+0xca/0x297
 irq_exit+0xa6/0xb0
 do_IRQ+0x54/0xd0
 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
 </IRQ>
========
So, in all listified-receive handling, instead pull skbs off the lists with
 skb_list_del_init().

Fixes: 9af86f9 ("net: core: fix use-after-free in __netif_receive_skb_list_core")
Fixes: 7da517a ("net: core: Another step of skb receive list processing")
Fixes: a4ca8b7 ("net: ipv4: fix drop handling in ip_list_rcv() and ip_list_rcv_finish()")
Fixes: d8269e2 ("net: ipv6: listify ipv6_rcv() and ip6_rcv_finish()")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2021
[ Upstream commit 22f6bbb ]

list_del() leaves the skb->next pointer poisoned, which can then lead to
 a crash in e.g. OVS forwarding.  For example, setting up an OVS VXLAN
 forwarding bridge on sfc as per:

========
$ ovs-vsctl show
5dfd9c47-f04b-4aaa-aa96-4fbb0a522a30
    Bridge "br0"
        Port "br0"
            Interface "br0"
                type: internal
        Port "enp6s0f0"
            Interface "enp6s0f0"
        Port "vxlan0"
            Interface "vxlan0"
                type: vxlan
                options: {key="1", local_ip="10.0.0.5", remote_ip="10.0.0.4"}
    ovs_version: "2.5.0"
========
(where 10.0.0.5 is an address on enp6s0f1)
and sending traffic across it will lead to the following panic:
========
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3-ehc+ torvalds#701
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R710/0M233H, BIOS 6.4.0 07/23/2013
RIP: 0010:dev_hard_start_xmit+0x38/0x200
Code: 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 20 48 85 ff 48 89 54 24 08 48 89 4c 24 18 0f 84 ab 01 00 00 48 8d 86 90 00 00 00 48 89 f5 48 89 44 24 10 <4c> 8b 33 48 c7 03 00 00 00 00 48 8b 05 c7 d1 b3 00 4d 85 f6 0f 95
RSP: 0018:ffff888627b437e0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: dead000000000100 RCX: ffff88862279c000
RDX: ffff888614a342c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff888618a88000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00000000000003e8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff888614a34140 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000062 R14: dead000000000100 R15: ffff888616430000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888627b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6d2bc6d000 CR3: 000000000200a000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 __dev_queue_xmit+0x623/0x870
 ? masked_flow_lookup+0xf7/0x220 [openvswitch]
 ? ep_poll_callback+0x101/0x310
 do_execute_actions+0xaba/0xaf0 [openvswitch]
 ? __wake_up_common+0x8a/0x150
 ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x87/0xc0
 ? queue_userspace_packet+0x31c/0x5b0 [openvswitch]
 ovs_execute_actions+0x47/0x120 [openvswitch]
 ovs_dp_process_packet+0x7d/0x110 [openvswitch]
 ovs_vport_receive+0x6e/0xd0 [openvswitch]
 ? dst_alloc+0x64/0x90
 ? rt_dst_alloc+0x50/0xd0
 ? ip_route_input_slow+0x19a/0x9a0
 ? __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb+0x198/0x1b0
 ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x856/0xa30
 ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x856/0xa30
 ? cpumask_next_and+0x19/0x20
 ? find_busiest_group+0x12d/0xcd0
 netdev_frame_hook+0xce/0x150 [openvswitch]
 __netif_receive_skb_core+0x205/0xae0
 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x11e/0x220
 netif_receive_skb_list+0x203/0x460
 ? __efx_rx_packet+0x335/0x5e0 [sfc]
 efx_poll+0x182/0x320 [sfc]
 net_rx_action+0x294/0x3c0
 __do_softirq+0xca/0x297
 irq_exit+0xa6/0xb0
 do_IRQ+0x54/0xd0
 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
 </IRQ>
========
So, in all listified-receive handling, instead pull skbs off the lists with
 skb_list_del_init().

Fixes: 9af86f9 ("net: core: fix use-after-free in __netif_receive_skb_list_core")
Fixes: 7da517a ("net: core: Another step of skb receive list processing")
Fixes: a4ca8b7 ("net: ipv4: fix drop handling in ip_list_rcv() and ip_list_rcv_finish()")
Fixes: d8269e2 ("net: ipv6: listify ipv6_rcv() and ip6_rcv_finish()")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
[ for 4.14.y and older, just take the skbuff.h change - gregkh ]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gatieme pushed a commit to gatieme/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2022
ANBZ: torvalds#701

commit c7ede4f linux-next.

Make cmd_ring_size changeable similar to the way it is done for
max_data_area_mb, the reason is that our tcmu client will create
thousands of tcmu instances, and this will consume lots of mem with
default 8Mb cmd ring size for every backstore.

One can change the value by typing:
    echo "cmd_ring_size_mb=N" > control
The "N" is a integer between 1 to 8, if set 1, the cmd ring can hold
about 6k cmds(tcmu_cmd_entry about 176 byte) at least.

The value is printed when doing:
    cat info
In addition, a new readonly attribute 'cmd_ring_size_mb' returns the
value in read.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1644978109-14885-1-git-send-email-kanie@linux.alibaba.com
Reviewed-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
afs_make_call() calls rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() to begin a call (which may
get stalled in the background waiting for a connection to become
available); it then calls rxrpc_kernel_set_max_life() to set the timeouts -
but that starts the call timer so the call timer might then expire before
we get a connection assigned - leading to the following oops if the call
stalled:

	BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
	...
	CPU: 1 PID: 5111 Comm: krxrpcio/0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-build3+ torvalds#701
	RIP: 0010:rxrpc_alloc_txbuf+0xc0/0x157
	...
	Call Trace:
	 <TASK>
	 rxrpc_send_ACK+0x50/0x13b
	 rxrpc_input_call_event+0x16a/0x67d
	 rxrpc_io_thread+0x1b6/0x45f
	 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x35
	 ? rxrpc_input_packet+0x519/0x519
	 kthread+0xe7/0xef
	 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x1b/0x1b
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Fix this by noting the timeouts in struct rxrpc_call when the call is
created.  The timer will be started when the first packet is transmitted.

It shouldn't be possible to trigger this directly from userspace through
AF_RXRPC as sendmsg() will return EBUSY if the call is in the
waiting-for-conn state if it dropped out of the wait due to a signal.

Fixes: 9d35d88 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request May 1, 2023
afs_make_call() calls rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() to begin a call (which may
get stalled in the background waiting for a connection to become
available); it then calls rxrpc_kernel_set_max_life() to set the timeouts -
but that starts the call timer so the call timer might then expire before
we get a connection assigned - leading to the following oops if the call
stalled:

	BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
	...
	CPU: 1 PID: 5111 Comm: krxrpcio/0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-build3+ torvalds#701
	RIP: 0010:rxrpc_alloc_txbuf+0xc0/0x157
	...
	Call Trace:
	 <TASK>
	 rxrpc_send_ACK+0x50/0x13b
	 rxrpc_input_call_event+0x16a/0x67d
	 rxrpc_io_thread+0x1b6/0x45f
	 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x35
	 ? rxrpc_input_packet+0x519/0x519
	 kthread+0xe7/0xef
	 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x1b/0x1b
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Fix this by noting the timeouts in struct rxrpc_call when the call is
created.  The timer will be started when the first packet is transmitted.

It shouldn't be possible to trigger this directly from userspace through
AF_RXRPC as sendmsg() will return EBUSY if the call is in the
waiting-for-conn state if it dropped out of the wait due to a signal.

Fixes: 9d35d88 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
intersectRaven pushed a commit to intersectRaven/linux that referenced this pull request May 17, 2023
[ Upstream commit db099c6 ]

afs_make_call() calls rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() to begin a call (which may
get stalled in the background waiting for a connection to become
available); it then calls rxrpc_kernel_set_max_life() to set the timeouts -
but that starts the call timer so the call timer might then expire before
we get a connection assigned - leading to the following oops if the call
stalled:

	BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
	...
	CPU: 1 PID: 5111 Comm: krxrpcio/0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-build3+ torvalds#701
	RIP: 0010:rxrpc_alloc_txbuf+0xc0/0x157
	...
	Call Trace:
	 <TASK>
	 rxrpc_send_ACK+0x50/0x13b
	 rxrpc_input_call_event+0x16a/0x67d
	 rxrpc_io_thread+0x1b6/0x45f
	 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x35
	 ? rxrpc_input_packet+0x519/0x519
	 kthread+0xe7/0xef
	 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x1b/0x1b
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Fix this by noting the timeouts in struct rxrpc_call when the call is
created.  The timer will be started when the first packet is transmitted.

It shouldn't be possible to trigger this directly from userspace through
AF_RXRPC as sendmsg() will return EBUSY if the call is in the
waiting-for-conn state if it dropped out of the wait due to a signal.

Fixes: 9d35d88 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
promovicz pushed a commit to promovicz/linux that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
[ Upstream commit db099c6 ]

afs_make_call() calls rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() to begin a call (which may
get stalled in the background waiting for a connection to become
available); it then calls rxrpc_kernel_set_max_life() to set the timeouts -
but that starts the call timer so the call timer might then expire before
we get a connection assigned - leading to the following oops if the call
stalled:

	BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
	...
	CPU: 1 PID: 5111 Comm: krxrpcio/0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-build3+ torvalds#701
	RIP: 0010:rxrpc_alloc_txbuf+0xc0/0x157
	...
	Call Trace:
	 <TASK>
	 rxrpc_send_ACK+0x50/0x13b
	 rxrpc_input_call_event+0x16a/0x67d
	 rxrpc_io_thread+0x1b6/0x45f
	 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x35
	 ? rxrpc_input_packet+0x519/0x519
	 kthread+0xe7/0xef
	 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x1b/0x1b
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Fix this by noting the timeouts in struct rxrpc_call when the call is
created.  The timer will be started when the first packet is transmitted.

It shouldn't be possible to trigger this directly from userspace through
AF_RXRPC as sendmsg() will return EBUSY if the call is in the
waiting-for-conn state if it dropped out of the wait due to a signal.

Fixes: 9d35d88 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants