Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Materialize expression_statement nodes #124

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

josharian
Copy link

@josharian josharian commented Jul 10, 2023

The hard work was done by Alan.
See #73 for the original pull request, from which this was extracted.

Checklist:

  • All tests pass in CI.
  • There are sufficient tests for the new fix/feature.
  • Grammar rules have not been renamed unless absolutely necessary.
  • The conflicts section hasn't grown too much.
  • The parser size hasn't grown too much (check the value of STATE_COUNT in src/parser.c).

The hard work was done by Alan.
See tree-sitter#73
for the original pull request, from which this was extracted.

Co-authored-by: Alan Donovan <alan@alandonovan.net>
@josharian
Copy link
Author

cc @amaanq

@amaanq amaanq merged commit 8c8007e into tree-sitter:master Jul 11, 2023
3 checks passed
@josharian josharian deleted the expr_stmt branch July 11, 2023 23:21
@adonovan
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Josh! I was using this for a brief project in my last week at GitHub. Thanks for finishing it off.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants