You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we run core/tools/codegen/gen_font.py script, it creates a diff in generated font definitions. This is because of manual changes done to individual glyps for better visual appearance on certain models. The changes are documented by commentary but IMHO they should be defined in the script so that manual changes to generated code are not necessary.
Changes are done to
font_unifont_regular_16
font_pixeloperatormono_regular_8
font_pixeloperator_regular_8
font_pixeloperator_bold_8
font_ttsatoshi_demibold_18.c and font_ttsatoshi_demibold_21.c - alternative numeral glyphs used
font_ttsatoshi_demibold_42.c - uppercase fonts completely removed to save space - they are not used anywhere at the moment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note on font_ttsatoshi_demibold_18/21.c. Numerals (0 - 9 mapped to glyph indices 1298-1307 as of #3954 . Done manually by modifying gen_font.py as follows. A systematic solution would be better.
If we run
core/tools/codegen/gen_font.py
script, it creates a diff in generated font definitions. This is because of manual changes done to individual glyps for better visual appearance on certain models. The changes are documented by commentary but IMHO they should be defined in the script so that manual changes to generated code are not necessary.Changes are done to
font_unifont_regular_16
font_pixeloperatormono_regular_8
font_pixeloperator_regular_8
font_pixeloperator_bold_8
font_ttsatoshi_demibold_18.c
andfont_ttsatoshi_demibold_21.c
- alternative numeral glyphs usedfont_ttsatoshi_demibold_42.c
- uppercase fonts completely removed to save space - they are not used anywhere at the momentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: