Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add UPDATE to file-based access control docs #11445

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2022

Conversation

nineinchnick
Copy link
Member

Description

Add UPDATE to file-based access control docs, required by UPDATE <table> but also REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW

Is this change a fix, improvement, new feature, refactoring, or other?
update existing docs

Is this a change to the core query engine, a connector, client library, or the SPI interfaces? (be specific)
docs

How would you describe this change to a non-technical end user or system administrator?
document missing permission

Related issues, pull requests, and links

Documentation

( ) No documentation is needed.
(x) Sufficient documentation is included in this PR.
( ) Documentation PR is available with #prnumber.
( ) Documentation issue #issuenumber is filed, and can be handled later.

Release notes

(x) No release notes entries required.
( ) Release notes entries required with the following suggested text:

# Section
* Fix some things. ({issue}`issuenumber`)

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Mar 13, 2022
@nineinchnick nineinchnick requested a review from kokosing March 13, 2022 11:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Mar 13, 2022
@nineinchnick nineinchnick requested review from mosabua and jhlodin March 13, 2022 11:18
@kokosing kokosing merged commit f4d5751 into trinodb:master Mar 14, 2022
@kokosing
Copy link
Member

Merged, thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 374 milestone Mar 14, 2022
@nineinchnick nineinchnick deleted the fbac-update branch March 14, 2022 15:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants