Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NAS-133109 / 25.04 / Refactor PAM config generation #15218

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anodos325
Copy link
Contributor

This commit refactors how we generate custom PAM configuration lines so as to force them to run though a parser, and adds tests for said parser. pam_tty_audit is also enabled for interactive sessions for root account if for some reason a user gets interactive root session when GPOS STIG is enabled (this should never happen).

@bugclerk bugclerk changed the title Refactor PAM config generation NAS-133109 / 25.04 / Refactor PAM config generation Dec 16, 2024
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

This commit refactors how we generate custom PAM configuration
lines so as to force them to run though a parser, and adds tests
for said parser. pam_tty_audit is also enabled for interactive
sessions for root account if for some reason a user gets interactive
root session when GPOS STIG is enabled (this should never happen).
@anodos325 anodos325 requested a review from bmeagherix December 17, 2024 16:28
PAMLine(
pam_service=PAMService.AUTH,
pam_control=(
PAMControl(PAMResponse.SUCCESS, 2),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be

PAMControl(PAMResponse.SUCCESS, 1),

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. 1 is what's used in current common-auth for a server attached to FreeIPA.

PAMLine(
pam_service=PAMService.ACCOUNT,
pam_control=(
PAMControl(PAMResponse.SUCCESS, 2),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In current code, attached to the FreeIPA I see the following in common-account:
account [success=1 new_authtok_reqd=done default=ignore] pam_unix.so
Maybe this line should have 1 and not 2?

PAMLine(
pam_service=PAMService.AUTH,
pam_control=(
PAMControl(PAMResponse.SUCCESS, 2),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. 1 is what's used in current common-auth for a server attached to FreeIPA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants