Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NAS-131483 / Add ZFS support for FSCTL_DUP_EXTENTS_TO_FILE #416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

anodos325
Copy link
Collaborator

This commit adds support for auto-detecting block cloning support and allowing relevant FSCTL via SMB protocol.

source3/modules/smb_libzfs.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/smb_libzfs.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core.c Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core.c Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core_rw.c Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core_rw.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core_rw.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core_rw.c Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core_rw.c Show resolved Hide resolved
source3/modules/vfs_zfs_core_rw.c Show resolved Hide resolved
This commit adds support for auto-detecting block cloning support
and allowing relevant FSCTL via SMB protocol. Since ZFS allows
cloning between different ZFS datasets (volumes) the checks
in source3/smbd are somewhat relaxed as well.
@anodos325 anodos325 changed the title Add ZFS support for FSCTL_DUP_EXTENTS_TO_FILE NAS-131483 / Add ZFS support for FSCTL_DUP_EXTENTS_TO_FILE Oct 4, 2024
@anodos325 anodos325 merged commit f6af864 into SCALE-v4-20-stable Oct 4, 2024
@anodos325 anodos325 deleted the NAS-131483 branch October 4, 2024 20:00
@mark99i
Copy link

mark99i commented Oct 9, 2024

It's a great job.
We are waiting this in TrueNAS Community Edition

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants