Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show instance for scala.Symbol #1484

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2016
Merged

Show instance for scala.Symbol #1484

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2016

Conversation

durban
Copy link
Contributor

@durban durban commented Dec 4, 2016

This also makes sure, that cats.instances.AllInstances contains the Symbol instances.

BTW, there are other instances, which are not in AllInstances (and as a result, are not in scope after doing import cats.implicits._), e.g., Eq[BitSet]. Is this intentional?

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 4, 2016

Current coverage is 92.21% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1484 into master will increase coverage by <.01%

@@             master      #1484   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           242        243     +1   
  Lines          3609       3610     +1   
  Methods        3540       3491    -49   
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches         69        119    +50   
==========================================
+ Hits           3328       3329     +1   
  Misses          281        281          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 25d11c4...2c20154

@johnynek
Copy link
Contributor

johnynek commented Dec 5, 2016

👍

I don't think any instances being missing from AllInstances is intentional. If so, we should add a comment to that effect (probably both at AllInstances and the instance in question).

@kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@kailuowang kailuowang merged commit 8fceb7f into typelevel:master Dec 5, 2016
@durban durban deleted the topic/symbolShow branch February 26, 2017 14:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants