Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up EitherT doctests #1693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2017

Conversation

peterneyens
Copy link
Collaborator

With the partial unification fix in place, we can clean up some EitherT doctests a bit.

With the partial unification fix in place, we can clean up some
`EitherT` doctests.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 20, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1693 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1693   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.94%   93.94%           
=======================================
  Files         241      241           
  Lines        4096     4096           
  Branches      156      156           
=======================================
  Hits         3848     3848           
  Misses        248      248
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
core/src/main/scala/cats/data/EitherT.scala 96.52% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cc4080c...07c53e6. Read the comment docs.

@djspiewak
Copy link
Member

👍 from me as well. Merging with three sign-offs.

@djspiewak djspiewak merged commit 07c53e6 into typelevel:master May 25, 2017
@stew stew removed the in progress label May 25, 2017
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 1.0.0-MF milestone May 25, 2017
@peterneyens peterneyens deleted the eithert-doctest-cleanup branch May 27, 2017 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants