Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add docs for Arrow #1924

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 29, 2017
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions docs/src/main/resources/microsite/data/menu.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ options:
url: typeclasses/show.html
menu_type: typeclasses

- title: Arrow
url: typeclasses/arrow.html
menu_type: typeclasses

###########################
# Data Types Menu Options #
###########################
Expand Down
179 changes: 179 additions & 0 deletions docs/src/main/tut/typeclasses/arrow.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
---
layout: docs
title: "Arrow"
section: "typeclasses"
source: "core/src/main/scala/cats/arrow/Arrow.scala"
scaladoc: "#cats.arrow.Arrow"
---
# Arrow

`Arrow` is a type class for modeling composable relationships between two types. One example of such a composable relationship is function `A => B`; other examples include `cats.data.Kleisli`(wrapping an `A => F[B]`, also known as `ReaderT`), and `cats.data.Cokleisli`(wrapping an `F[A] => B`). These type constructors all have `Arrow` instances. An arrow `F[A, B]` can be thought of as representing a computation from `A` to `B` with some context, just like a functor/applicative/monad `F[A]` represents a value `A` with some context.

Having an `Arrow` instance for a type constructor `F[_, _]` means that an `F[_, _]` can be composed and combined with other `F[_, _]`s. You will be able to do things like:
- Lifting a function `ab: A => B` into arrow `F[A, B]` with `Arrow[F].lift(ab)`. If `F` is `Function1` then `A => B` is the same as `F[A, B]` so `lift` is just the identity function.
- Composing `fab: F[A, B]` and `fbc: F[B, C]` into `fac: F[A, C]` with `Arrow[F].compose(fbc, fab)`, or `fab >>> fbc`. If `F` is `Function1` then `>>>` becomes an alias for `andThen`.
- Taking two arrows `fab: F[A, B]` and `fbc: F[B, C]` and combining them into `F[(A, C) => (B, D)]` with `fab.split(fbc)` or `fab *** fbc`. The resulting arrow takes two inputs and processes them with two arrows, one for each input.
- Taking an arrow `fab: F[A, B]` and turning it into `F[(A, C), (B, C)]` with `fab.first`. The resulting arrow takes two inputs, processes the first input and leaves the second input as it is. A similar method, `fab.second`, turns `F[A, B]` into `F[(C, A), (B, A)]`.

## Examples

### `Function1`

`scala.Function1` has an `Arrow` instance, so you can use all the above methods on `Function1`. The Scala standard library has the `compose` and `andThen` methods for composing `Function1`s, but the `Arrow` instance offers more powerful options.

Suppose we want to write a function `meanAndVar`, that takes a `List[Int]` and returns the pair of mean and variance. To do so, we first define a `combine` function that combines two arrows into a single arrow, which takes an input and processes two copies of it with two arrows. `combine` can be defined in terms of `Arrow` operations `lift`, `>>>` and `***`:

```tut:book:silent
import cats.arrow.Arrow
import cats.implicits._

def combine[F[_, _]: Arrow, A, B, C](fab: F[A, B], fac: F[A, C]): F[A, (B, C)] =
Arrow[F].lift((a: A) => (a, a)) >>> (fab *** fac)
```

We can then create functions `mean: List[Int] => Double`, `variance: List[Int] => Double` and `meanAndVar: List[Int] => (Double, Double)` using the `combine` method and `Arrow` operations:

```tut:book:silent
val mean: List[Int] => Double =
combine((_: List[Int]).sum, (_: List[Int]).size) >>> {case (x, y) => x.toDouble / y}

val variance: List[Int] => Double =
// Variance is mean of square minus square of mean
combine(((_: List[Int]).map(x => x * x)) >>> mean, mean) >>> {case (x, y) => x - y * y}

val meanAndVar: List[Int] => (Double, Double) = combine(mean, variance)
```

```tut:book
meanAndVar(List(1, 2, 3, 4))
```

Of course, a more natural way to implement `mean` and `variance` would be:

```tut:book:silent
val mean2: List[Int] => Double = xs => xs.sum.toDouble / xs.size

val variance2: List[Int] => Double = xs => mean2(xs.map(x => x * x)) - scala.math.pow(mean2(xs), 2.0)
```

However, `Arrow` methods are more general and provide a common structure for type constructors that have `Arrow` instances. They are also a more abstract way of stitching computations together.


### `Kleisli`

A `Kleisli[F[_], A, B]` represents a function `A => F[B]`. You cannot directly compose an `A => F[B]` with a `B => F[C]` with functional composition, since the codomain of the first function is `F[B]` while the domain of the second function is `B`; however, since `Kleisli` is an arrow (as long as `F` is a monad), you can easily compose `Kleisli[F[_], A, B]` with `Kleisli[F[_], B, C]` using `Arrow` operations.


Suppose you want to take a `List[Int]`, and return the sum of the first and the last element (if exists). To do so, we can create two `Kleisli`s that find the `headOption` and `lastOption` of a `List[Int]`, respectively:

```tut:book:silent
import cats.data.Kleisli

val headK = Kleisli((_: List[Int]).headOption)
val lastK = Kleisli((_: List[Int]).lastOption)
```

With `headK` and `lastK`, we can obtain the `Kleisli` arrow we want by combining them, and composing it with `_ + _`:

```tut:book:silent
val headPlusLast = combine(headK, lastK) >>> Arrow[Kleisli[Option, ?, ?]].lift(((_: Int) + (_: Int)).tupled)
```

```tut:book
headPlusLast.run(List(2, 3, 5, 8))
headPlusLast.run(Nil)
```

### `FancyFunction`

In this example let's create our own `Arrow`. We shall create a fancy version of `Function1` called `FancyFunction`, that is capable of maintaining states. We then create an `Arrow` instance for `FancyFunction` and use it to compute the moving average of a list of numbers.

```tut:book:silent
case class FancyFunction[A, B](run: A => (FancyFunction[A, B], B))
```

That is, given an `A`, it not only returns a `B`, but also returns a new `FancyFunction[A, B]`. This sounds similar to the `State` monad (which returns a result and a new `State` from an initial `State`), and indeed, `FancyFunction` can be used to perform stateful transformations.

To run a stateful computation using a `FancyFunction` on a list of inputs, and collect the output into another list, we can define the following `runList` helper function:

```tut:book:silent
def runList[A, B](ff: FancyFunction[A, B], as: List[A]): List[B] = as match {
case h :: t =>
val (ff2, b) = ff.run(h)
b :: runList(ff2, t)
case _ => List()
}
```

In `runList`, the head element in `List[A]` is fed to `ff`, and each subsequent element is fed to a `FancyFunction` which is generated by running the previous `FancyFunction` on the previous element. If we have an `as: List[Int]`, and an `avg: FancyFunction[Int, Double]` which takes an integer and computes the average of all integers it has seen so far, we can call `runList(avg, as)` to get the list of moving average of `as`.

Next let's create an `Arrow` instance for `FancyFunction` and see how to implement the `avg` arrow. To create an `Arrow` instance for a type `F[A, B]`, the following abstract methods need to be implemented:

```
def lift[A, B](f: A => B): F[A, B]

def id[A]: F[A, A]

def compose[A, B, C](f: F[B, C], g: F[A, B]): F[A, C]

def first[A, B, C](fa: F[A, B]): F[(A, C), (B, C)]
```

Thus the `Arrow` instance for `FancyFunction` would be:


```tut:book:silent
implicit val arrowInstance: Arrow[FancyFunction] = new Arrow[FancyFunction] {

override def lift[A, B](f: A => B): FancyFunction[A, B] = FancyFunction(lift(f) -> f(_))

override def first[A, B, C](fa: FancyFunction[A, B]): FancyFunction[(A, C), (B, C)] = FancyFunction {case (a, c) =>
val (fa2, b) = fa.run(a)
(first(fa2), (b, c))
}

override def id[A]: FancyFunction[A, A] = FancyFunction(id -> _)

override def compose[A, B, C](f: FancyFunction[B, C], g: FancyFunction[A, B]): FancyFunction[A, C] = FancyFunction {a =>
val (gg, b) = g.run(a)
val (ff, c) = f.run(b)
(compose(ff, gg), c)
}
}

```

Once we have an `Arrow[FancyFunction]`, we can start to do interesting things with it. First, let's create a method `accum` that returns a `FancyFunction`, which accumulates values fed to it using the accumulation function `f` and the starting value `b`:

```tut:book:silent
def accum[A, B](b: B)(f: (A, B) => B): FancyFunction[A, B] = FancyFunction {a =>
val b2 = f(a, b)
(accum(b2)(f), b2)
}
```

```tut:book
runList(accum[Int, Int](0)(_ + _), List(6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1))
```

To make the aformentioned `avg` arrow, we need to keep track of both the count and the sum of the numbers we have seen so far. To do so, we will combine several `FancyFunction`s to get the `avg` arrow we want.

We first define arrow `sum` in terms of `accum`, and define arrow `count` by composing `_ => 1` with `sum`:

```tut:book:silent
import cats.kernel.Monoid

def sum[A: Monoid]: FancyFunction[A, A] = accum(Monoid[A].empty)(_ |+| _)
def count[A]: FancyFunction[A, Int] = Arrow[FancyFunction].lift((_: A) => 1) >>> sum
```

Finally, we create the `avg` arrow in terms of the arrows we have so far:

```tut:book:silent
def avg: FancyFunction[Int, Double] =
combine(sum[Int], count[Int]) >>> Arrow[FancyFunction].lift{case (x, y) => x.toDouble / y}
```

```tut:book
runList(avg, List(1, 10, 100, 1000))
```