Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve build by not displaying each success test #2065

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 6, 2017

Conversation

kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

@kailuowang kailuowang commented Dec 5, 2017

Our test log is always too long to display inside travis, the raw log downloaded is a really a pain to read.
This change will make it only display success TestSuite names in JVM tests. So with this change it should be a lot easier to see where build fails.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 5, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #2065 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2065   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.66%   94.66%           
=======================================
  Files         318      318           
  Lines        5380     5380           
  Branches      112      203   +91     
=======================================
  Hits         5093     5093           
  Misses        287      287

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c51fe61...ec2a853. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@ceedubs ceedubs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems pretty reasonable to me. The logs for builds certainly are quite verbose.

@ceedubs ceedubs merged commit bf3c022 into typelevel:master Dec 6, 2017
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Dec 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants