Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace Stream in ExhaustiveCheck with List #2896

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2019

Conversation

kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

Also added Scala version specific folders for tests
fixed a minor symbol package object file not in the package warning.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 19, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #2896 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #2896      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   94.17%   94.2%   +0.02%     
=========================================
  Files         368     368              
  Lines        6949    6949              
  Branches      304     309       +5     
=========================================
+ Hits         6544    6546       +2     
+ Misses        405     403       -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rc/main/scala/cats/instances/SymbolInstances.scala 100% <ø> (ø)
.../src/main/scala/cats/laws/discipline/MiniInt.scala 97.29% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...n/scala/cats/laws/discipline/ExhaustiveCheck.scala 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...cala/cats/kernel/instances/FunctionInstances.scala 100% <0%> (+3.03%) ⬆️
testkit/src/main/scala/cats/tests/Helpers.scala 100% <0%> (+4%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f9b6a79...5bc5857. Read the comment docs.

@kailuowang kailuowang merged commit d822620 into typelevel:master Jun 19, 2019
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 2.0.0-RC1 milestone Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants